search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
From the Editor-in-Chief I @


Email Nelson McCouch III ArmyALT@gmail.com


BACK TALK


Let us know how well we are meeting your needs. Send an email to ArmyALT@gmail.com.


For more news, information and articles, please go to the USAASC website at


http://asc.army.mil. Click on the Publications tab at the top of the page.


recently had the great fortune to attend the Harvard Senior Executive Fellows program. Te goal of the course is not to teach you “what” to think, but to provide you with the


skills of “how” to think, using a strategic approach and framework for problem-solving. One particular problem-solving simulation evokes the theme of this issue: requirements.


Our team was presented the problem of effectively communicating how to assemble a jumble of differ- ent shapes into a particular figure. We had a diagram of the finished product, made up of approximately 22 different shapes—everything from circles, to squares, to a rhombus (it took me a while to fig- ure out what that even was). We had approximately 20 minutes to write down instructions, without diagrams, so that a production group could build what we envisioned. At this point, if you’re an astute reader, you might be thinking, “Hey, that sounds like Training and Doctrine Command (or TRADOC) defining future system requirements.” You would be right.


We painstakingly wrote detailed instructions on how best to combine the various shapes to achieve the desired end state, such as, “Take the circles and the short oblong piece and the large square, and put them together so the right side is flat.” It made per- fect sense to us, given that we had the diagram of the finished product.


Enter the group required to actually produce the item, and feel free to substitute the Army Acqui- sition Workforce. Te hardest part of the exercise was watching the production group try to follow the written instructions. What seemed crystal clear on our “requirements” side got badly mangled on the production side. After 20 minutes, the production group built a product using all the parts, but in a much different shape than intended.


Our team was one of several that did not deliver a final product. However, many of the teams suc- cessfully built the final product. Te difference? Teir requirements were not overly prescriptive but described the final shape desired, letting the pro- duction group hammer out the details. In almost every case of less instruction, the group delivered the desired product well ahead of the 20-minute goal.


Te moral of the story: “Tell them what you want, not how to build it.”


Tis insight applies not only in the academic setting of Harvard University, but in the real world of Army acquisition as well. Case in point: In this issue, you can learn the importance of generating requirements from MG Cedric T. Wins, in a Q&A with the Army Capabilities Integration Center deputy director.


Find out what it takes to get them right from the Program Executive Office (PEO) for Enterprise Information Systems’ aptly named article “Get- ting Requirements Right.” It’s about transitioning lifesaving quick reaction capabilities to programs of record for permanent use by the Army, and the challenge of documenting requirements to support the transition. Creating clearly understandable requirements takes teamwork. See how the PEO for Command, Control and Communications – Tactical uses lessons learned to develop a uni- fied approach that evolves radio requirements and technologies incrementally. Also, hear how indus- try tackles tricky requirements problems from Dr. Ryan Dirkx, head of research and development for Arkema America. (You may never have heard of them, but you probably use many of their products, which include fuel lines, refrigerants and coatings such as paints.)


In addition to these articles, there are lots more insights in this issue on how to implement and man- age requirements using knowledge management, effective communication and continuous process improvement techniques.


Finally, you should know that Army AL&T magazine is a recognized leader in delivering information you need in a state-of-the-art man- ner. In March, your magazine won first place for digital publications in the Army’s 2014 MG Keith L. Ware Public Affairs Competition, which rec- ognizes Soldiers and DA civilian employees and organizations for excellence in effective commu- nications. With that in mind, please check out our online publication at http://usaasc.armyalt. com. See all the photos and other extras avail- able, and share a link with a friend or co-worker. Questions or comments? Write to me at ArmyALT@gmail.com.


+


Nelson McCouch III Editor-in-Chief


ASC.ARMY.MIL 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156