search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SHAPING ARMY ACQUISITION


PEOPLE OVER


PROCESS


The Army Training Information System is using human-centered design to provide value to Soldiers.


by Lt. Col. Jim A. Lee T


he acquisition community is in the midst of a seismic shift. Large-scale acquisitions typically follow a set of rigid rules by which people must play; the pitfalls of this approach, however, are numerous. One obsta- cle is the tendency to place more value on the acquisition process itself


than on providing innovation and value for Soldiers.


Tis line of thinking is beginning to change. Although incremental in nature, a culture shift is beginning to affect the ways in which the acquisition community thinks, works and plans. In fact, this nascent shift is formalized in places like the Defense Innovation Board, which strives to recommend industry best practices to DOD challenges. To that end, there is increasing recognition that strict adherence to a project plan can stifle innovation and deter progress, and that Soldiers—not binders containing regulations and guidelines—should take priority. To maximize value to Soldiers, some acquisition teams are beginning to embrace flexible prod- uct development and its inherent unpredictability. Adopting an Agile approach integrates iterative project development, which is a radical break from traditional acquisition behavior.


Te Program Executive Office for Enterprise Information Systems’ (PEO EIS) Army Training Information System (ATIS) team is embracing this change of culture and process to provide valuable training to Soldiers.


Before ATIS, there has not been a centralized system providing Army commanders, leaders, Soldiers and civilians with a common operating picture of the training envi- ronment across the three domains: operational, institutional and self-development.


https://asc.ar my.mil 31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120