search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


UNDERSTANDING ACQUISITION: THE COLORS OF MONEY


The first thing to understand about the colors of money is that there are no colors and no actual money, and it only gets more complicated from there.


T


he financial management of defense acquisition is so complex and unintuitive that almost any analogy breaks down quickly. An overview of what "the colors of money" means would—in a


classroom at the Naval Postgraduate School or Defense Acqui- sition University—be part of a much larger, several-hours-long discussion on defense financial management. Colors of money is shorthand for categories of budget appropriations. Colors of money is a single dimension of defense financial management that itself is multidimensional and next to impossible to illus- trate in two dimensions. Te graphic that follows is necessarily simplified and does not address every potential complication.


Colors of money, like lots of concepts in defense-speak, is misleading but not inaccurate. Tere is, in fact, no actual money. Neither are there colors. Congress gives DOD budget authority, that is, the authorization to obligate the government to pay bills with appropriated funds.


Tere are five colors of money, but color is only one dimen- sion. Another dimension is time. Each color has a use-by date. Another dimension is the different ways that Congress and DOD slice and dice the different categories of budget author- ity. Colors of money is a way of expressing and controlling what a budget authority may and may not be used for. It is accounting, but also a way to understand how Congress and DOD talk to one another. If you look at the research, develop- ment, testing and evaluation budget, that tells you something about the Army's modernization budget. It's not "the modern- ization budget," it's just what Congress has said that the Army can spend toward its modernization goals in terms of research and development of new capabilities. Likewise, procurement is


another side of the Army's modernization budget, as these two comprise the principal categories for acquisition managers.


Other terms that you hear associated with the colors of money are—in no particular order—the POM, PPBE, FYDP (often pronounced "FIE-dip"). Te POM is the program objective memorandum, which is a product of the programming part of PPBE—the planning, programming, budgeting and execu- tion process. FYDP, the Future Years Defense Program, is the classified database spanning 10 years of all funding catego- ries, projecting DOD’s needs in each.


Tose with an in-depth understanding of defense finan- cial management find it virtually impossible to talk about the colors of money without getting into PPBE, POM and FYDP and other things, because they're all linked and inter- dependent.


PPBE—a topic for another day—is where it all starts. PPBE, according to the Congressional Research Service, is intended "to establish a framework for connecting strategic objectives with resources." (Emphasis added.) Te pea-soup clarity of the terminology masks another temporal dimension to the defense financial management profession in that it is a constant and nonstop annual process employing many thousands of experts.


—JOHN DILLARD, Col. USA (Ret.) and recently retired senior lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School


—STEVE STARK, senior editor, Army AL&T


https://asc.ar my.mil


69


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120