search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMPETITION IN COOPERATION


• Partner country agrees to LOA and provides required funding or rejects LOA.


3. Acquisition


• Implementing agency manages contracting or requisi- tion of equipment and services specified in signed agree- ment.


4. Delivery • Partner country provides equipment delivery addresses.


• Partner country may use freight forwarder or pay to use the U.S. military transportation system.


5. Case Closure


• An FMS case may be closed when all materiel has been delivered, all ordered services have been performed and no new orders exist or are forthcoming.


• Partner country and government meet to resolve out- standing issues and close case.


• Implementing agency certifies case for closure and residual funds are made available for reuse.


INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT COMPETITIVE RESTRICTIONS Because the Competition in Contracting Act applies to the award and administration of contracts to fulfill the U.S. government’s requirements and not the needs of a foreign country, a DOD agency is not required to provide for full and open competition when competition is restricted under an international agreement or treaty.


A contracting officer is prohibited from executing a contract action without providing for full and open competition unless the action is justified and approved. Under current Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) procedures, a justi- fication and approval is not required when an LOA is executed between the foreign country and the government.


Te requirement for a justification and approval to limit competi- tion for contracts awarded under an international agreement was changed in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 under Section 817(a) of Public Law 101-189. Tat law permitted preparation of a document, rather than a justification and approval, to limit full and open competition. Tat document describes the terms and directions of a sole-source action requested by a foreign country or international organiza- tion. (Section 817(a) essentially relaxed the administrative burden


of preparing a justification to limit competition that otherwise would have been required under the Competition in Contract- ing Act.)


Implementing Section 817(a), the DFARS explains that a justifi- cation and approval is not required for international agreements if the head of the contracting activity prepares a document describ- ing the sole source procurement for the partner nation.


In the Army FAR Supplement (AFARS), the document describ- ing the sole source procurement for the partner nation referred to in the DFARS is “International Agreement Competitive Restrictions.”


PSEUDO FMS DOD and other agencies may have statutory authorization under the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) of 1961, the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 or related programs to expend U.S.


DELIVERY STATUS UPDATE


Gen. Gustave F. Perna, then-commander of U.S. Army Materiel Command, received a briefing March 23, 2020, on how U.S. Army Security Assistance Command is managing challenges and successes executing its foreign military sales mission. (Photo by Tim Hanson, U.S. Army Security Assistance Command)


54


Army AL&T Magazine


Spring 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120