search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SHAPING ARMY ACQUISITION


organized the advisory group of compa- nies that donated funds for the project and is advising the researchers. “What we want to do is harness the intellectual talent around defense innovation, and figure out how to get more tech and prob- lem solving into the government,” Alex Gallo, Common Mission Project’s execu- tive director, said in a February interview with Army AL&T. Gallo previously was a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank, and a staffer for the House Armed Services Committee.


TECH WHERE IT'S NEEDED Gallo, who is also a West Point graduate, looks back at his deployment to Iraq as an infantry officer in 2004 as an example of an acquisition process that had lost its way. “When we got to Kuwait, we got a ton of really interesting and cool equipment. My Soldiers and I, we had fun learning about it in the deserts of Kuwait. But when we went to Samarra, Iraq, and combat, all of that new equipment sat in our Connex [cargo container] for the entire year, because they were all solutions in search of problems. And they were not solutions to any of our problems.”


Te Common Mission Project is looking for problem-based solutions for defense acquisition. “We want a problem-based, disciplined and, yes, entrepreneur- ial framework,” using industry’s agile approach, Gallo said. “But it has to be within a disciplined framework. And it has to be a problem-based solution, because we could bring in a ton of emerging technol- ogy, and at a rapid pace, but they may not actually serve a warfighter need.”


McGinn started George Mason’s Center for Government Contracting in 2019. Taking advantage of its location—the university is a 35-minute drive from the Pentagon, depending on traffic (which


PHONE A FRIEND


Cadet Jay Yang, a member of the U.S. Military Academy class of 2020, speaks with an expert on the phone while taking notes during a Hacking for Defense course in July 2019. (Photo by Brandon O’Connor, U.S. Military Academy at West Point)


during pre-COVID times could be formi- dable)—the center seeks to fill a niche that no other university has filled—“the business of government and the overall ecosystem of government contracting,” as McGinn put it. “Tere’s no university really, as a research center, focused around the business of government and how the Department of Defense and other agen- cies work with companies. I saw that and it surprised me.”


CONCLUSION In a year, the acquisition playbook that the GMU study produces will aim to combine the best of commercial and defense inno- vation in a product that government professionals will find educating, infor- mative and full of practical approaches to innovative acquisition. Te playbook will be used for not only the benefit of the


students, but also the benefit of govern- ment, industry and academia.


“It's really about taking the tools that have been developed, in law and regulation and then policy, and helping the system move forward, because a lot of this is about changing culture,” McGinn said.


MICHAEL BOLD provides support to


contract the U.S. Army Acquisition


Support Center. He is a writer-editor for Network Runners Inc., with more than 30 years of editing experience at newspapers, including the McClatchy Washington Bureau, Te Sacramento Bee, the San Jose Mercury News, the Dallas Morning News and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. He holds a Bachelor of Journalism from the University of Missouri.


https://asc.ar my.mil 43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120