search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENTARY


As the NDS notes, “New commercial technology will change society and, ulti- mately, the character of war. Tat many technological developments will come from the commercial sector means that state competitors and non-state actors will also have access to them, a fact that risks eroding the conventional overmatch to which our nation has grown accustomed.” Recognizing the importance of speed and the dominance of the commercial realm’s technology progress, the question becomes how we get it to our Soldiers quickly. How do we tap into, adapt and adopt the inno- vation being developed by commercial entities at a rate faster than China and Russia can?


MORE NEEDS DOING We have taken some good, necessary steps in allowing commercial compa- nies to more easily engage in contracting with our bureaucratic acquisition and contracting policies, such as increased use of other-transaction authority. However, China has a distinct advantage to tapping


into its own advancing commercial tech- nology, as Flournoy noted in her Foreign Affairs piece. China’s “doctrine of ‘civil- military fusion,’ ” she wrote, “requires that any commercial or academic tech- nological advancement with military implications be shared with the [People’s Liberation Army].”


A survey of the world’s top defense contractors shows America with the top five defense revenue-producing compa- nies in the world. However, the American economic model, with the exception of the Boeing Co., typically yields a distinct line between defense and commercial companies. Te world’s No. 1 defense revenue-producing company, Lockheed Martin, garners 95 percent of its reve- nue from defense, with the other top companies between 75 percent and 94 percent. China contradicts this model. With five companies in the world’s top 15 for defense revenue, Chinese companies are also heavily involved in commercial enterprises, with only 20 to 38 percent of


their revenue being generated by defense. This provides for an easier opportu- nity for Chinese companies to transition advanced commercial technology into defense products.


If we are to retain our overmatch capa- bilities, we will need the advanced technologies being developed by our most innovative commercial companies. We must stop simply providing ways that allow commercial companies to provide defense products. We must develop more creative ways to actively attract and encourage these world-leading technology companies into providing our Soldiers the war-winning products that will deter our competition. Tere are specific ways that we can do that.


Expand the use of other-transaction authority. One of the primary ways that innovative commercial companies connect to defense projects is through other-transaction authority. Te use of that mechanism has shown an impressive


DIFFERENT PORTFOLIOS


Unlike the U.S. defense industry, which produces most of its revenue strictly from defense, China’s top defense companies are also heavily involved in commercial enterprises. (Graphic by U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center, statistics from Defense News and the International Institute for Strategic Studies)


https://asc.ar my.mil 87


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120