search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


appropriated funds on “pseudo” FMS cases. Tese pseudo or “simulated” cases are so named because they are usually administered under the FMS structure, except that the U.S. government, not the partner nation, is the purchaser.


Building Partner Capacity, one of three FMS categories discussed previously, is composed of missions, programs, activi- ties and authorities intended to improve the ability of other nations to achieve security-oriented goals shared with the United States. It is a crucial tool used by DOD and other government agencies in furtherance of U.S. national security objectives.


Building Partner Capacity programs are funded with U.S. government appropri- ations and administered within the FMS structure. Tese programs may provide defense articles or services to other govern- ment departments and agencies under the authority of the Economy Act or other authorities to build the capacity of part- ner nation security forces and enhance their capability to conduct counterterror- ism, counterdrug and counterinsurgency operations, or to support U.S. military and stability operations, multilateral peace operations and other programs.


To execute the Building Partner Capacity program through the foreign military sales structure, a U.S. government "requesting authority," which is usually a combatant command, defines the Building Partner Capacity requirement composed of defense articles or services for a partner nation in a memorandum of request (MOR) and submits it to the DOD "implementing agency," such as the State Department, that will have overall responsibility to create the pseudo FMS case, execute it and ensure its proper completion. A foreign military sales case is a “pseudo FMS case” when the implementing agency


INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION


Capt. Anthony McClain and Chief Warrant Officer 3 Nicole Matteson, 108th Sustainment Brigade, meet with Iraqi Army Joint Repair Parts Command commander and an Office of Security Cooperation – Iraq foreign military sales logistics officer in February 2019. (Photo by Sgt. Socorro Delgadillo, Army National Guard)


or other executive agency of the federal government executes a pseudo (or simu- lated) LOA to provide defense articles or services to another U.S. government department or agency. Tat department or agency will then deliver the articles or services identified in the original MOR to the partner nation.


Te government uses appropriated funds for the procurement of articles or services that are described in the pseudo LOA. Te appropriated funds are placed in the FMS Trust Fund by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and an autho- rized representative of the implementing agency will sign the “U.S. Signature” block on the pseudo LOA.


Because the LOA is not signed by the part- ner nation that will ultimately receive the articles or services, but serves to docu- ment the transfer of articles and services to the government requesting authority, it is often referred to as a “pseudo LOA” or a “pseudo FMS case.”


Five phases of the pseudo FMS process: 1. Assistance Request


• U.S. combatant commands and in-country security cooperation organizations identify require- ments and draft a memorandum of request with input from U.S. implementing agencies and part- ner countries.


https://asc.ar my.mil


55


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120