search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ATACMS TO PRSM


“The two major differences between the ATACMs and PrSM today are range and loadout quantities.”


While the ATACMS uses pods that contain a single missile with a maxi- mum range of roughly 300 kilometers (approximately 190 miles), PrSM provides two rounds per launch pod, with maxi- mum ranges exceeding 400 kilometers (nearly 250 miles). Both missile systems are compatible with the Multiple Launch Rocket System M270A2 and High Mobil- ity Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) M142 family of launchers.


Tis increase in loadout capacity allows for more munitions to be carried and launched from a single platform without the need for additional pods, or reloads, thereby enhancing the operational flex- ibility and firepower of the system and enabling more efficient and effective use of the missile system in various combat scenarios. Additionally, PrSM represents a quantum leap in precision strike capabil- ities. Te increased missile range provides greater standoff, which improves crew and launcher survivability.


IF IT AIN’T BROKE ATACMS was first deployed during Oper- ation Desert Storm, but its development origins actually date back to the Cold War era (1945-1989), when it was developed to counter the former Soviet Union’s arsenal of long-range artillery and missile systems. Tough never used by the Army during the Cold War period, its advanced tech- nology made it a highly valuable weapon during Operation Desert Storm, enabling the precision strikes, long-range targeting and significant firepower that were instru- mental in the success of the campaign.


Coined “Steel Rain” by Soldiers during Desert Storm, ATACMS replaced the Lance Missile System (1972-1992), a track-mounted system capable of deliver- ing nuclear warheads. It was designed to provide the Army with a versatile weapon system capable of delivering precision strikes against a variety of targets, includ- ing enemy air defenses, command and control centers, logistics facilities and troop concentrations. At the time—much like today—there was a significant emphasis on long-range precision strike capabilities to deter aggression and respond effectively in case of conflict.


LEVERAGING ATACMS


A U.S. Army Soldier prepares the crane for loading the ATACMS onto HIMARS in support of Talisman Sabre 2023, held in July at Williamson Airfield in Queensland, Australia. (Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Andrew Dickson, 133rd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment)


Te need for a system like ATACMS arose from the recognition that traditional artil- lery systems had limitations in terms of range, accuracy and lethality when it came to striking targets deep within enemy territory. Te development of a missile system capable of delivering highly accu- rate strikes at extended ranges—made possible by advancements in missile tech- nology, guidance systems and propulsion systems—addressed this operational requirement and provided commanders with a new tool for engaging distant and high-value targets.


“Te ATACMS missile includes providing the warfighter with an ability to engage


140 Army AL&T Magazine Summer 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148