search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADAPTING EXPERIMENTATION AND TESTING


SPECIAL DELIVERY


The delivery of the first prototype hypersonic hardware to Soldiers of the 5th Battalion, 3rd Field Artillery Regiment, 17th Field Artillery Brigade was completed in October 2021 and marked by a ceremony at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington. (Photo by Spc. Karleshia Gater, I Corps)


until they are ready to strike and by then it’s too late to react,” according to Army statements in a March 2023 Congressional Research Service report. Te report further noted that the missile component of the LRHW, developed by Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman Corp., can be fired from surface vessels and submarines.


“Te term ‘hypersonic weapon’ is often confusing,” Farrell said. “Technically, a weapon is hypersonic if it travels faster than five times the speed of sound. But by this measure, nearly all ballistic missiles going back to World War II are hyper- sonic.” Te real difference with today’s hypersonic weapons, he said, is that they combine multiple features that in the aggregate make them very hard to shoot down. Speed, maneuverability (unpredict- ability) and flight at relatively low altitudes (as compared to ballistic missiles) make


modern hypersonic weapons survivable and more likely to reach the intended target.


Te Army and Navy are closely partnered and the Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike program and Army’s LRHW program share development efforts and resources. “Te Navy leads the design of the CHGB, while the Army leads its production,” Farrell said. “Previous hyper- sonic technology development has largely resided only within government labs, but recently has significantly transitioned to industry.”


The CHGB is based on the Alter- nate Re-Entry System developed by the Army and Sandia National Laborato- ries. Currently, Leidos Dynetics is under contract to produce CHGB prototypes for the Army and Navy. According to the


congressional report, “Te CHGB uses a booster rocket motor to accelerate to well above hypersonic speeds and then jettisons the expended rocket booster. Te CHGB, which can travel at Mach 5 or higher on its own, is planned to be maneuverable, potentially making it more difficult to detect and intercept.”


“Hypersonic weapons solve the prob- lem of survivability to target,” Farrell said. “Ultimately, hypersonics provide a combination of speed, maneuverability and a flight profile enabling survivable, long-range, rapid defeat of time-critical, heavily defended and high value targets.”


POWERING THROUGH CHALLENGES Accelerated programs like LRHW inevi- tably face hurdles, potentially leading to technical and logistical challenges. While


https://asc.ar my.mil 63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148