search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PREPARE TO LAUNCH


“The MRC rapidly progressed from a blank piece of paper in July 2020 to the Soldiers’ hands in just over two years.”


and fabricated in record time and delivered to the unit in Decem- ber 2022.


“Following new equipment training, the gaining unit at Joint Base Lewis-McChord supported two successful flight test events demonstrating the system and unit’s readiness to support oper- ations,” Farrell said. “Following munitions delivery, the MRC reached its full operational status, and the unit is currently supporting operational exercises, exercising the hardware and networks needed to conduct these missions.”


By using existing Navy munitions, the Army inherits the capa- bilities provided by these missiles. “Future variants of both the SM-6 and Tomahawk will provide greater range, speed and the ability to prosecute a wider range of targets with great effect,” Farrell said. “Te Army and Navy have linked destinies, both wanting these missiles as soon as possible to meet operational needs. Tis requires consistent progress, funding and support to ensure these enhanced capabilities are developed and produced on time to meet operational needs.”


Te missiles are housed at a government-owned facility and MRC munitions are currently maintained by the Navy at key sites worldwide. Because the MRC can be deployed around the world, MRC munitions storage will ultimately support opera- tional demands where needed.


Te MRC program is a fully funded, $629 million program that expects to deliver a total of five batteries to the operational force. Te Army’s system uses several common components with the Navy as well as the Navy’s munitions.


“By purchasing these with the Navy, economies of scale can be achieved, supporting both service’s bottom lines,” said Maj. Bren- dan Georgas, MRC assistant product manager.


Te first battery of MRC capability is currently in the field as part of the Army’s 1st Multi-Domain Task Force, which is gaining experience training on and employing the system in operational environments. Te MRC program continues to produce and enhance capabilities of additional batteries that will be used


66 Army AL&T Magazine Summer 2024


around the world as needed to ensure freedom of movement for U.S. and allied forces.


“With MRC as part of the joint force, the Army will provide combatant commanders the ability to shape the battlespace in contested areas from the land,” Farrell said.


CONCLUSION Te Army’s advancements of its LRHW and MRC weapon systems mark significant milestones in modern warfare technol- ogy. Tese systems offer unparalleled speed, range and precision, bolstering the Army’s capacity to deter and swiftly respond to emerging threats.


Looking ahead, sustained investment in research, development and deployment will be imperative to fully harness the poten- tial of these technologies. Fostering international collaboration and strategic planning will be vital to seamlessly integrate these capabilities into broader defense strategies.


As these systems continue to evolve, they have the potential to fundamentally reshape the dynamics of military engagements, underscoring the importance of responsible and strategic use in preserving global stability and security.


For more information, go to https://www.army.mil/peoms.


CHERYL MARINO provides contract support to the U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center (USAASC) at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, as a writer and editor for Army AL&T magazine and Network Runners Inc. Before joining USAASC, she served as a technical report editor at


the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities


Development Command Center at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for five years. She holds a B.A. in communications from Seton Hall University and has more than 20 years of writing and editing experience in both the government and private sectors.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148