search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADAPTING EXPERIMENTATION AND TESTING


program transition to the Army, as the Single Manager for Conventional Ammunition, by 2026.


LIGHTER MATERIAL, CONSIDERABLE CHALLENGES PdM SCA works hand in hand with the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Armament Center (DEVCOM AC), DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (ARL) and industry partners to advance lightweight ammunition solu- tions. While polymer materials have great potential to maximize weight savings, their physical and chemical properties present unique technical and life cycle challenges that are not present in metallic alternatives. “Extreme temperature performance has historically been a challenge with polymer materials,” said Brian Kim, project officer for Lightweight Small Caliber Ammuni- tion at DEVCOM AC. “Tere are also many unknowns with how polymer will perform in terms of long-term storage and shelf life. However, with the recent development and incremen- tal testing of new case designs, we have increased confidence in meeting Army extreme temperature requirements. Accelerated aging studies are currently ongoing to inform the limitations of polymer ammunition storage.”


In maturing 7.62 mm polymer ammunition technology, the team has learned that testing often and failing early is key to learning. PdM SCA is currently executing an other-transaction authority contract with a polymer ammunition vendor, maximizing test iterations and data exchange between the contractor and the U.S. government. “It is critical to have a continuous feedback loop of designing tests to isolate and understand key variables, test execution first at ambient and then at operational tempera- ture extremes, and then use those observations to refine the test design for the next round of testing,” Randy Mrozek, Ph.D., team lead for polymer physics and processing at DEVCOM ARL, explained. “Tis critical feedback loop is only enabled by having


“It is critical to have a continuous feedback loop of designing tests to isolate and understand key variables.”


https://asc.ar my.mil 47


expertise in ammunition manufacturing, weapons operation and materials understanding on the development team.”


CONCLUSION Lightweight small-caliber efforts have come a long way. Despite the inherent challenges of incorporating new materials into prod- ucts, the successful fielding of XM1186 and XM1188 as well as the approval of MK323 for fielding to the Marine Corps set a path for further lightweight integration. PdM SCA continues to leverage collaborative opportunities through the JLWIPT, incre- mental testing methodology and industry expertise to support weight reduction priorities that will benefit the warfighter.


For more information, go to the PdM SCA webpage at https:// jpeoaa.army.mil/Project-Offices/PM-MAS/Teams/PdM- Small-Caliber.


MAJ. ROBERT K. RODELL is the project officer for Lightweight Small Caliber Ammunition and Precision Munitions, serving as an assistant product manager for PdM SCA within PM MAS, assigned to JPEO A&A at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey. He holds an M.A. in transportation and logistics management from American Military University and a B.S. in criminology from George Mason University and served as a logistics officer for 10 years before joining the Army Acquisition Workforce in 2022.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148