search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THEN & NOW


CONCLUSION Te Army’s transition from the Lance Missile System to ATACMS to PrSM represents more than just a shift in weap- onry. It embodies the pursuit of innovation and adaptability in the face of evolv- ing threats and marks a pivotal shift in modern warfare capabilities.


Te decision to replace the ATACMS with the PrSM reflects the Army’s commit- ment to fielding advanced and capable weapon systems that meet the challenges of modern warfare. Te PrSM’s perfor- mance, extended range, lethality and technological advancements make it a suit- able successor to the legacy systems.


NO SECOND LANCES


More than half of the Lance missiles stored at the Anniston Munitions Center have been demilitarized using a process performed by the Redstone Test Center and its contract partner, Engineering Research and Consulting. (Photo by Jennifer Bacchus, Anniston Army Depot)


With PrSM’s advanced long-range preci- sion fires capabilities, the Army stands ready to meet the challenges of tomorrow’s battlefield with unmatched effectiveness and precision.


For more information, go to https:// www.army.mil/peoms.


CHERYL MARINO provides contract support


to


including range, lethality and techni- cal sophistication, and fulfilling specific objectives. By breaking down the devel- opment process this way, the Army can manage risk, optimize resources and ensure a systematic progression toward achieving the desired performance and operational effectiveness for the system.


Ames said initial PrSM prototype flight tests began in 2019, and initial delivery of the first increment of early operational capability missiles began in November 2023, following successful production qualification testing at WSMR.


According to Lockheed Martin, PrSM was designed to achieve the Army’s 400


kilometer-plus requirement and was built with open architecture to ensure new capabilities can be incorporated to achieve longer ranges. “PrSM’s modular design offers an easy path to future growth,” the company stated. Tat increased capabil- ity will provide even greater flexibility to commanders.


In March 2024, Lockheed announced that it had been awarded a fourth production contract from the Army to produce more early operational capacity precision strike missiles. Tat contract will allow for a significant increase in production capacity to meet Army demand. Additional testing, including an Army-led user test, is planned for later this year.


the U.S. Army Acquisition


Support Center (USAASC) at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, as a writer and editor for Army AL&T magazine and Network Runners Inc. Before coming to USAASC, she served as a technical report editor at the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Center at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for five years. She holds a B.A. in communications from Seton Hall University and has more than 20 years of writing and editing experience in both the government and private sectors.


https://asc.ar my.mil


143


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148