search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADAPTING EXPERIMENTATION AND TESTING


“When we have innovative partners that come out into the field with us … they find that things are very different from how they envisioned it in their labs.”


With support from the EI Cell, the Diagnostic Systems Division plans to participate in next year’s Arctic Edge to conduct base- line testing on another group of technologies, to be followed by additional cold-weather testing during which warfighters will get a chance to use the diagnostic tools in training scenarios, follow- ing the protocols developed by the USAMRIID team based on their Arctic Edge experience.


CONCLUSION In just a short time, USAMRDC’s Experimentation Integration Cell has made it easier for the organization’s DRUs to field-test a wide range of impactful, life-saving medical capabilities, includ- ing pathogen diagnostics, casualty collection and protection, temperature sensors and hypothermia prevention, freeze-dried plasma and oxygen generators. As the command’s central coor- dinator for participation in experimentation events, the EI Cell eliminates pain points that would otherwise prevent participants from getting the most out of their time in the field.


Furthermore, because much of the experimentation conducted at USAMRDC is iterative, research teams may want to return to annual and semiannual exercises in subsequent years, partic- ularly when a capability has matured to the point where it is ready to be handed off to warfighters to see how they train with it and incorporate it into their routine operations. Te ability of the EI Cell to build lasting relationships with event sponsors gives DRUs confidence that their experimentation teams will have the information they need to plan and execute those exper- iments successfully.


Te leaders of the EI Cell believe their approach to integra- tion could represent a model for other military services and government research organizations to improve their agility in developing, testing and fielding new capabilities.


“What started as a way to coordinate the DRUs has evolved into a joint and interagency capability that acts like glue or mortar


https://asc.ar my.mil 27


holding the process together,” said Nuckols. “You need to have cool minds at the table who understand that failure is accept- able. It’s the nature of experimentation that things will change; you have to be able to capture value in the change. How we over- come that failure and how we learn from it is what the EI Cell does very well. We’re not going in with a firm vision of what will happen; we’re going in with an agile vision of what can happen and how to take advantage of that to get better results.”


For more information, go to https://mrdc.health.mil.


PAUL LAGASSE is a public affairs writer with USAMRDC. He has an M.A. in history and an M.L.S. in archival studies from the University of Maryland and a B.A. in history from Regis University. Before working in public affairs for the Army and Navy, he was a newspaper reporter and a freelance writer and editor.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148