search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADAPTING EXPERIMENTATION AND TESTING


of viable cannon configurations that could improve ignition of the propelling charge. Te team chose several of these configu- rations for testing in the ballistic simulator to provide data for the model validation process. Te team used this data to update the models.


Validation is the key to any modeling effort.


PULLING IT ALL TOGETHER At this point of the project, the team was in place, the tools were created and validated and there were thousands of differ- ent cannon configurations to potentially improve ignition to be evaluated.


Te next step in this process was to use the surrogate model to navigate through all the cannon design configurations. Te team filtered the cannon configurations using the value functions that consider other factors that are important to the design of cannon artillery. Tis includes projectile muzzle velocity, cannon chamber pressure limits and manufacturing capability. Once all these other factors were included, the team was able to success- fully down-select to a single cannon configuration that will improve ignition. A complete cannon is being manufactured to this configuration and is scheduled to be live-fire tested late in the third quarter of fiscal year 2024 as the final validation of the team’s efforts.


CONCLUSION In addition to developing a new cannon chamber to improve igni- tion, this project brought together a technically diverse team to develop a novel DSDT for a collaborative design of the cannon- propelling charge interface, while keeping focus on the system aspect. Te tools and processes developed allow team members to conduct numerous analyses, as required, without the need for timely and costly live-fire testing. Te team can use these model- ing and simulation tools to develop whole cannon and propelling charge systems jointly or even assess the interaction of either developmental propelling charges in an existing cannon or a developmental cannon with existing propelling charge systems.


One major potential application of the DSDT can be applied to the conflict in Eastern Europe. Tis tool can provide an


https://asc.ar my.mil 83 SIMULATOR IGNITION


Screen shots from a high-speed video shows ignition in a ballistic simulator during a test event in November 2023 at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona. The ballistic simulator is a test apparatus that ignites propellant in a clear tube to facilitate visual analysis. (Image by Peter Harvey, PD TAS)


assessment of interoperability among the many different artil- lery cannons and propellant system combinations currently seen. Not knowing how these systems interface can lead to catastrophic results. Tis is also a major benefit to the U.S. Army as it can all be completed without the extra cost and scheduling implications of traditional prototyping and live-fire development procedures.


For more information, contact the author at peter.j.harvey.civ@ army.mil.


PETER HARVEY is a program management engineer with PD TAS at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey. He holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering technology from the State University of New York at Alfred. He is a DAWIA certified Practitioner in engineering and technical management.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148