search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


its internal procedures to award the contract, and the available funding is obligated at that time to cover the anticipated costs of the contract. Te local contract unit either generates a task order on an existing contract vehicle or writes a new solicitation and eventual contract award.


As a contract is executed, a background process occurs to ensure the contract is completed to standard within the terms and condi- tions of the contract. A designated government representative, also known as a contracting officer representative, monitors contract performance and ensures that the contractor adheres to the terms and conditions of the contract. When the terms and conditions are fully met, the contracting officer reviews the contractor’s invoice and submits payment to finance. Finance then pays the vendor using the originally set aside amount.


Following payment, the contracting officer then verifies that the vendor was fully paid for the services rendered. Te government tends to award large contracts for commodities such as fuel and obligate a large amount of funds in advance. Tese funds are attached to these contracts and cannot be used for any other requirements until it is fully paid out. Te obligated contract funding is checked for consistency after final payment, and any unspent funds are returned to the U.S. government for other requirements. Tis background process is referred to as contract closeout. If all of these processes take place, then a contract- ing officer completes an administrative action to close out the contract. Closed contracts are archived for a period of six years, as required by law, in case a vendor submits a future claim, which is a written assertion from a vendor seeking relief, monetary or otherwise.


Tis system in place worked for normal steady-state operations. Following the collapse of Afghanistan, the requiring activity redeployed and had no need for new goods or services. ACC-A was then charged with both identifying which contracts were still needed and which ones needed to be closed as soon as possible to avoid incurring additional costs to the government. ACC-A also had to identify which contracts were fully performed and which vendors were owed money for services rendered.


THE CONTRACTING UNIT ACC-A was originally located in Bagram, Afghanistan, but because of the changing situation through the summer of 2021, the command relocated to Qatar and performed over-the-horizon support from there. Te team was comprised of Department of the Army civilians and Soldiers.


Following the collapse of the Afghan government, the mission of ACC-A changed from executing contracts for emerging require- ments to quickly closing out the contracts that were in place supporting over 20 years of war. Because of this situation, the Army had to take immediate action to ensure that all vendors were paid what they were owed by the U.S. government and close all available contracts as soon as possible. Because of this unusual situation, the small 15-member team had to work together to develop novel processes and procedures to get after this unique problem set.


PROBLEMS, PROBLEMS Te first problem we faced was to determine how many contracts were remaining to close out. Te headquarters of Army Contract- ing Command, located in Huntsville, Alabama, was instrumental in doing research into digital contract files across 20 years to determine workload. Tis research resulted in the identification of over 30,000 contracts requiring closeout. An automated close- out script for contracts over 6 years old was executed by Army


IN THE KNOW


Master Sgt. Kerry Dubose, ACC-A contracting officer, provides a detailed, hands-on demonstration of contracting systems to the Defense Security Cooperation Management Office – Afghanistan director, Brig. Gen. John Reim, in February.


https://asc.ar my.mil


65


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140