‘MoB’ RULES
alternatives from which to choose and/or few criteria to evaluate, and the stakes are high if the project fails.
Te next step is to calculate cost criteria scores using the raw data. Obvious statistical outliers, which include bids that do not account for basic hardware costs or are more than twice the IGCE, are immediately removed from the analysis. Offers then are judged based on their relation to the IGCE and each other. Te raw numbers are converted to percentages (percentage above and percentage
below the IGCE baseline)
and into whole numbers. Scores that are more than 25 percent above or below the baseline are considered risky and are penalized heavily in the final analysis.
Te product team calculates perfor- mance and schedule criteria scores by totaling the quantified answers to the SS/RFI questionnaire, and translates scores into their RDVs for direct com- parison to other offerors’ scores in the final analysis.
Final offeror scores are calculated based upon the PdM’s criteria weighting. (See Figure 3 on Page 105.) Raw data entered into the matrix automatically provide a recommendation
BASE SUPPORT
SPC David Ceballos, a welder and machinist with 201st Brigade Support Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division (3-1 ID), welds a metal piece to a base plate at Forward Oper- ating Base Apache, Afghanistan, Aug. 7, 2013. PdM SKOT manages metalworking, machining, cutting and welding devices among its broad portfolio of SKOTs. (U.S. Army photo by SGT Kandi Huggins, 3-1 ID)
for the program
to either buy commercially or make organically. Te PdM team reviews the process for accuracy and makes a for- mal recommendation to the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) based on the matrix findings.
CONCLUSION Tis new process represents a positive, useful step in better understanding and leveraging the industrial base. In the past, we did not have a good process to consider using organic manufactur- ers, instead soliciting only commercial industry for work. Tis path routinely
106 Army AL&T Magazine
provided—and often still provides— appropriate capability, competition and a successful program. However, it often left acquisition professionals unable to even consider organic options that take advantage of facilities already owned by DOD. Organic options can help to ensure a more ready workforce at each arsenal and depot as needed for
specialized, surge or production missions.
To date, multiple PdM SKOT new- start programs have been designated as
“make” items under this process because of the ability to analyze competition better. Competition, after all, is the acquisition professional’s greatest tool to drive best value.
PdM SKOT’s new process enhances competition by improving the Army’s ability to understand the broader
January–March 2014 contingency
industrial base and compare its organic manufacturing facilities with commer- cial industry. Commercial sources will still often prove the more economical option, but today’s acquisition profes- sionals have a new tool to competitively seek the best value for our taxpayers and best capability for our Soldiers.
For more information, go to
www.peocscss.
army.mil.
MR. STEVE LE FEBVRE is a systems acquisition manager for PdM SKOT. He holds a B.S. in philosophy from Illinois State University, and master’s
degrees
in business administration and supply chain management
from Indiana Uni-
versity. LeFebvre is Level III certified in program management and in life-cycle logistics. He is a member of the U.S. Army Acquisition Corps.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180