IN THE KNOW
SPC Daniel Sanders, an infantryman with 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Divi- sion, troubleshoots Intelligent Power Technology generators during NIE 14.1 at Fort Bliss, TX, Oct. 28, 2013. PEO C3T, CECOM and PEO IEW&S are spearheading a new, more unit-centric, less system-specific role for FSRs who train Soldiers, with the goal of enhancing Soldiers’ understanding of systems. (Photo by SSG George Gutierrez, 212th Fires Brigade, 24th Press Camp Headquarters)
paradigm uses a four-tiered approach to maintaining equipment readiness. (See
“Back to Basics,” Army AL&T magazine, July-September 2013, Page 22.) In this approach, Soldiers are the first level of support for operating and maintaining C4ISR equipment. Logistics assistance representatives (LARs), digital systems engineers (DSEs) and select FSRs serve on Tier 1 as the second level of support. When resolution is unattainable at Tier 1, the appropriate system-specific subject- matter experts at Tier 2 will attempt to resolve the issue telephonically or remotely, if necessary passing the problem up to Tier 3 engineers to determine a hardware or modification.
software
LARs, DSEs and select FSRs will support all C4ISR weapon and communications systems in the field, with each member aligned to specific systems. For example, although PEO C3T’s Project Manager Mission Command (PM MC) fields
both the Command Post of the Future (CPOF) and Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data Systems (AFATDS), cur- rently system-specific FSRs are dedicated to maintaining each system. Under the realignment, FSRs will be unit-centric, thus
AFATDS, but all capabilities MC fields to a BCT.
supporting not only CPOF and that PM
Te tiered structure has been Soldier- tested with pilot and validation exercises at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC), Fort Polk, LA, and the National Training Center (NTC), Fort Irwin, CA, during FY13 rotations. Te
exercises
determined that 78 percent of all trouble tickets were training-related and could be resolved at a lower echelon, had training been performed at home station before the rotations.
In support of the changing field support construct, the Army has also introduced the Unified Trouble Ticketing System
(UTTS) to provide a virtual reporting mechanism that connects Soldiers with LARs, DSEs and FSRs. Te UTTS streamlines the trouble ticket request process and can be accessed through the unit’s SharePoint application to report incidents quickly.
Te realignment, which is scheduled to be implemented for all future JRTC and NTC rotations, is expected to yield more than $70 million in cost avoidance for the Army during FY14-20.
MR. RICHARD LICATA, the field support manager for PEO C3T’s Readiness Management Division, is leading the field support a B.S.
optimization effort. He in organizational management
from Wilmington University. He is Level III certified in program management and is a member of the U.S. Army Acquisition Corps.
holds
ASC.ARMY.MIL
61
ACQUISITION
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180