search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


facility, many types of equipment require extensive coordination for their delivery and installation prior to beneficial occu- pancy date. Access, schedule, supervision, custody, safety, security, utility provision, mechanical system access and space use, among other items, must be aligned to avoid conflict. Te joint-use plan is devel- oped to ensure that the entire facility can be made operational on schedule and that the total time and cost to the owner is mini- mized for the military construction project and for the associated fit-up. Te general contractor will ensure that all identified joint-use spaces meet minimum acceptance criteria, defined via coordination with the owner prior to outfitting.


VALUE ADDED Te joint-use plan document provides all parties a foundational understanding about how a project is being phased as part of a strategic delivery process. Tis is essential for larger projects with equip- ment items requiring long lead times and extensive access and utility coordination. Te value of planned coordination is for all parties to understand the conditions of project phasing, the physical state of proj- ect completion, any special permitting or inspections necessary, documentation needed for fire and life safety and other health concerns necessary for a successful joint-use plan for those designated areas. For all other associated parties and other vendors involved with the project, the joint-use plan serves as the tool to deter- mine how to meet the general contractor’s


and owner’s ordinances and policies and to properly plug into the project phasing strategy.


APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED Te program office has been gathering lessons learned from various projects in different stages of construction and tran- sition to take corrective action that has been of increased value during the joint- use coordination effort. The program office has drawn lessons from the repos- itory compiled by USACE and the U.S. Army Health Facility Planning Agency. Tese documents serve as best practices for medical projects during their initial outfit- ting and transition period.


DESIGNING A JOINT- USE PLAN When planning your project, it is impor- tant to involve the end user and the owner as early as possible so that all parties understand the phasing strategy for both construction and occupancy. Typically, this is done by the project delivery team (architect, engineer, government represen- tatives, agent and contractor). Tis process is iterative as acquisition proceeds. Te initial meeting is most productive when plan-review staff and project manager inspection teams are involved, further assuring all parties understand the concept and execution of the phasing plan.


CONCLUSION Understanding the potential risks and cost overruns associated with transitioning


into a new facility can enable the owning organizations to effectively and predict- ably plan for smooth transitions from construction to operational readiness. Risk mitigation also affects long-term asset management by contributing to lower operation and maintenance costs, increased facility longevity and a superior customer or occupant experience.


With an increase in the level of technol- ogy in facilities coming online in the near future, it is imperative that the transi- tion planning, workforce preparation and data transference are consistent and reli- able for organizations expanding their portfolio and seeking an integrated oper- ation and asset management program from opening day of a new facility. By designing and implementing a carefully constructed and implemented joint-use plan, risks to the owner, agent and the project delivery team are minimized.


LT. COL. EDWIN H. RODRIGUEZ is the program manager for the Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Project. He has an M.A. in health service management from Webster University and a B.S. in biology from Universidad


Interamericana de Puerto


Rico. He is health facility planner, supply chain manager and a Lean Six Sigma Green Belt. He is a graduate of Army Command and General Staff College, the Health Facility Planning Agency internship program and the Army Medical Materiel Management internship program.


Joint-use decreases facility operational cost, minimizes equipment and supply variation while decreasing product consumption and inventory, streamlines staff training and creates opportunity for savings.


https://asc.ar my.mil 129


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172