search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FIELDING THE FUTURE


The Army is working across its acquisition, modernization, and research and development communities, joint partners and industry to experiment with these evolving technologies.


while evaluating various ground antenna solutions. In January, PEO C3T, the Network CFT and the CCDC team concluded the initial phases of MEO testing at the C5ISR Center’s Joint Satel- lite Communications Engineering Center at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Mary- land. Te experimentation characterized emerging MEO capability to see how the Army’s tactical network performed over the commercial MEO constella- tion, and it provided MEO constellation and terminal solution performance data and lessons learned to help inform capa- bility set design decisions. Because of the COVID-19 outbreak, MEO testing efforts were temporarily put on hold and will resume when Army leadership deliv- ers that guidance.


Te CCDC C5ISR Center is leading and pulling together the LEO test and experi- mentation efforts, with PEO C3T and the Network CFT monitoring these efforts as they evolve. Te focus is on understanding technical operation and system require- ments of specific LEO mega-constellation systems and analyzing ground terminal technology. CCDC C5ISR is working numerous LEO cooperative research and development agreements with multi- ple companies to test their services and antennas. Experimentation time frames will be driven by terminal availability and constellation coverage. CCDC C5ISR has also partnered with the Air Force Strategic Development Planning and Experimen- tation Office to award experimentation contracts for emerging ground terminals operating over LEO, MEO and GEO constellations.


ORBITAL OPTIONS


For optimal capability to support its network, the Army is reevaluating its satellite communications architecture. The intent is to incorporate both military and commercial solutions in a variety of constellations and orbits, and to leverage spacecraft developed by other government agencies and commercial providers. (U.S. Army graphic)


CONCLUSION Winning tomorrow’s wars against peer and near-peer adversaries requires U.S. forces to stay ahead in the technology race. Innovations in artificial intelligence, cloud computing and networking on the move will require significant enhancements in satellite communications transport, which could be realized through LEO, MEO and high-throughput GEO satellite systems. Smart planning and forward thinking will be essential to ensuring mission success on tomorrow’s multidomain battlefield.


For more information, go to http:// peoc3t.army.mil/c3t/; or contact the PEO C3T Public Affairs Office at 443-395-6489 or usarmy.APG.peo-c3t.mbx.pao- peoc3t@mail.mil.


JOHN ANGLIN is the Technical Management Division chief for Project Manager Tactical Network within PEO C3T. He has over 20 years of experience, as both a civilian and a Soldier, in Army tactical


network communications. He


has an M.S. in systems engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a B.S. in information


technology concentration


from Colorado Technical University. He is a member of the Army Acquisition Corps (AAC) and is Level III certified in engineering.


SETH SPOENLEIN is the senior scien- tific


technical manager for Integrated


Networks within the U.S. Army Futures Command’s CCDC C5ISR Center. He is the senior technical adviser supporting the Network Cross-Functional Team. He holds a Master of Engineering in systems engineer- ing from Stevens Institute of Technology and a B.S. in computer engineering from Lehigh University. He is a member of the AAC and is Level III certified in engineering.


AMY WALKER has been the public affairs lead at Project Manager (PM) Tactical Network for the last 10 years, and was the public affairs lead at PEO C3T for the previous two. She has covered a majority of the Army’s major tactical network transport modernization efforts, including Army, joint and coalition fielding and training events worldwide. She holds a B.A. in psychology, with emphasis in marketing and English, from the College of New Jersey. She is a frequent contributor to the Army AL&T; her byline appeared on “Rapid Network- ing” in the Winter 2020 issue.


https://asc.ar my.mil


81


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172