search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT


JOINT EFFORT


Employees and supervisors will work together on which courses or credentials the employee needs to pursue. (Graphic by Army DACM Office)


EXTENDED GRACE PERIODS A third paradigm shift moved the certi- fication grace period from a standard 24 months for every position to a certifica- tion grace period that directly aligns to the functional area tier assigned to that position, now a 3/5/4 model: Tose coded as Foundational or Professional now have a three-year grace period; those coded as Practitioner have a five-year grace period; and those coded as Advanced have a four- year grace period. Te extended grace periods were given to all current AAW members when Back-to-Basics was imple- mented, as well as to any new members after that date. Te reason grace periods were extended was to facilitate more of a focus on experiential learning and to try to prevent individuals from feeling that they had to rush through training to get certified right away. Te Army DACM, Ronald R. Richardson Jr., said that “the new emphasis on experience, and the right training at the right time, better supports our primary objective of provid- ing an agile and adaptive workforce with


the acquisition acumen and critical think- ing skills we need in support of the Army modernization enterprise.”


Given the new grace periods, the DACM Office changed the applicant criteria on many of its leadership and educational programs to allow those not yet certi- fied, but still within the grace period, to apply for those programs. Additional information on DACM programs may be found on the DACM website at https:// asc.army.mil/web/career-development/ programs/civilian/.


REDUCED SCRAP LEARNING Finally, the last paradigm shift is a reduc- tion in scrap learning with a focus on less prescriptive certification training. Scrap learning is an educational term that essen- tially represents wasted training time—the learning content that will never be applied by the learner. Te intent of this Back- to-Basics shift revolved around focusing more on a foundational level of learning. Anyone required to attend mandatory


training would be able to apply the content in their job and could expand on that base learning through just-in-time focused training (credentials). Tis reduction in training time would enable more time for on-the-job training (the experiential component of DAWIA certification) and dramatically increase the emphasis on the supervisor and employee relationship to determine training needs. Tis reduction in scrap learning resulted in significantly less required classroom time, enabling individuals to be present in their job more. It also enables individuals to seek out addi- tional training specific to their job in the form of credentials.


Te Army has transitioned military and civilian positions into the Back-to-Basics framework, reducing the AAW from over 40,000 members down to nearly 33,500 as it removed facilities engineering and adopted tighter restrictions on what constitutes financial management/cost estimating and life cycle logistics positions through its acquisition functional leaders.


https://asc.ar my.mil 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112