search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PROFESSIONAL AWARDS


PACKARD AWARDS


HONOR OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENTS


by Mr. Robert E. Coultas


Program Executive Office Ammunition’s Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems (PM CAS) received a David Pack- ard Excellence in Acquisition Award Nov. 2 for procurement innovations that have allowed it to compete individual require- ments, minimize unit cost, and maximize competition and the quantity delivered.


PM CAS was one of two acquisition organizations to be honored with the annual Packard Award, which recog- nizes superior program management and accomplishment in successfully execut- ing one or more of DOD’s Better Buying Power acquisition efficiency initiatives. Also receiving the Packard Award was the U.S. Navy’s DDG 51 Shipbuilding Program Office.


DOD’s highest acquisition team award was first given in 1997 in honor of David Packard, a former Deputy Secretary of Defense (1969-71) and co-founder and Chairman of the Hewlett-Packard Co. Packard, who died in 1996, founded the Defense Systems Management College and was a strong advocate of excellence in defense acquisition practices.


Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta announced the award recipients dur- ing a Pentagon ceremony. Te Secretary also awarded the first-ever Better Buy- ing Power Efficiency Award, which recognizes innovation in Better Buying


198 Army AL&T Magazine


Power (BBP) efforts. BBP was formally introduced to the DOD Acquisition Workforce in September 2010, with the objective of delivering needed warfight- ing capabilities within the constraints of a declining defense budget.


Frank Kendall, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, hailed the award recipients for their efforts and accomplishments. “Tese three teams are at the forefront of our efforts to increase acquisition inno- vation and professionalism,


as well as


efficiencies,” Kendall said. “We hope that these efforts are also recognized by others within the Department and are used as a template for increased innovation within the Acquisition Workforce.”


A SIMPLER WAY TO ACQUIRE AMMUNITION PM CAS, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ, received the Packard Award for establishing and implementing a highly efficient buying approach to acquiring critical ammuni- tion. (See related article, Page 154.)


In response to an increased need for artillery and mortar items, the PM CAS team developed a multiple-award, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ), 100 percent small business set- aside, best-value strategy for production


of ammunition.


was successfully implemented for the procurement of 53 artillery and mortar components totaling $2.7 billion and included significant room for both surge and Foreign Military Sales requirements.


Te PM CAS team “dramatically reduced the average time from receipt of require- ment to delivery—from 18-24 months to just 45-60 days—while also saving the government an estimated $60 million,” Panetta said.


COMPETITION CUTS SHIPBUILDING COSTS Te DDG 51 Shipbuilding Program Office, Program Executive Office Ships, Washington Navy Yard, DC, received the Packard Award for its success in conduct- ing an innovative competition to procure three DDG 51 (Arleigh Burke) Class guided missile destroyers. Instead of a traditional competition, the team devel- oped and executed a unique acquisition approach, called Profit Related to Offers, which gives a higher profit margin to the lowest realistic bidder. Tis new approach was in response to unacceptable pricing in shipbuilders’ earlier proposals.


Te Navy team set the standard for the follow-on multiyear


procurement of


future DDG 51 Class destroyers. “Tey created real competition in a situa- tion where none had previously existed, awarded $2.1 billion in contracts within six months, and saved the government $298 million,” Panetta said.


recurring Tis


single, simplified acquisition strategy January–March 2013


CRITICAL TREAMENT AND EVACUATION Te inaugural Better Buying Power Effi- ciency Award went to the Acquisition Rapid Response Medical Team for Tacti- cal Combat Casualty Care and Casualty Evacuation, Special Operations Research, Development, and Acquisition Center, U.S.


Special Operations Command,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212