search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
A LOOK BACK, AND AHEAD


good warm-up,” Winkler said. “There are always efficiencies to be gained when people are forced to be creative, and I’m confident the PEO and PMs will rise to the challenge.”


Winkler cited as one of PEO EIS’ best practices its PEO Strategy Map, a bal- anced scorecard based on the Strategy Map of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Tech- nology. Each of the PMs within PEO EIS in turn maintains its own Strategy Map to measure monthly against the PEO’s. “It is all tied into the Army’s Strategic Manage- ment System, viewable by everyone in the Army,” Winkler said.


WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Besides keeping programs and solu- tions moving forward to provide needed capability to Soldiers and civilians, Win- kler is proudest of PEO EIS’ success in developing the workforce and institut- ing processes to ensure that there is “no single point of failure,” so that the orga- nization can mature even while people come and go.


PEO EIS also established a Human Capi- tal Strategic Plan to develop the next generation of leaders at the PEO and PM levels. Part of its strategy to build new and existing talent is to recruit college students to work part-time while they are finishing their degrees, then hire them full-time after they graduate.


The Human Capital Strategic Plan was an output of a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt (LSS BB) project. “We work Lean Six Sigma really hard. I tell our people it’s not just about process improvement but about developing the workforce.” LSS is how people learn how a process “thread” is knitted through an entire organization, Winkler said. “And so they learn more


46 Army AL&T Magazine


provide opportunities for internal mobil- ity so that about 10 percent of the PEO EIS workforce each year can move into new assignments to broaden their skills and experience. “We’re not afraid to lose some of our best people” if it helps them and the Army, he said.


As Winkler himself prepared to depart, he said, “I’m practicing what I’ve preached to our workforce. I will have been PEO here for four years in October, so it’s time for me to move on.”


$4 BILLION RESPONSIBILITY


As the leader of PEO EIS, Winkler was respon- sible for more than 2,600 military, civilian, and contractor personnel executing approximately $4 billion in programs, or the equivalent of 56 percent of the Army’s FY10 information technol- ogy budget. (U.S. Army photo.)


about the organization, more about func- tional elements of the process.”


Another BB project at PEO EIS is looking at program offices to determine the right mix of entry, mid-, and senior-level staff.


“I think the tendency, with a hiring freeze or a pay freeze, is that organizations will get top-heavy. We want to avoid a situa- tion like we have in the contracting world, where we have a big gap in the middle skills,” Winkler said.


A key element of PEO EIS’ workforce development strategy, he said, is to


Since moving to the private sector, Win- kler has been consulting with industry to enhance understanding of government requirements and help build relationships. He is also standing up a government support systems engineering/technical assistance company that will tackle IT, cyber, and DOD challenges. He also planned to volunteer in the office of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Chief Information Officer.


“I want to continue providing value added to the government, and I feel the best place for me to do that is with private industry,” Winkler said.


PEO EIS’ programs “are in excellent shape,” with “an exceptional team who will keep these programs moving for- ward,” he said. “It’s a great office, with a lot of talent.”


Winkler’s successor as PEO EIS has not been announced.


MARGARET C. ROTH is the Senior Editor of Army AL&TMagazine. She holds a B.A. in Russian language and linguistics from the University of Virginia. Roth has more than a decade of experience in writing about the Army and more than two decades’ experience in journalism and public relations.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136