search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVANCING CAPABILITIES


Jill Smith, Director, U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development, and Engineering Center (CERDEC) (middle), talks to Dr. Meimei Tidrow (left) and Dr. Tom Broach about a prototype robotic countermine/counter-IED system at CERDEC Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (NVESD). Tidrow is the Chief Scientist for Focal Plane Arrays at NVESD, Fort Belvoir, VA, and Broach is the Chief Scientist for Countermine and Counter- IED technologies. (U.S. Army photo by Kimberly Bell, CERDEC-NVESD Public Affairs Office.)


recognized as their management counterparts within the Senior Executive Service (SES).


W


This article is intended to highlight the Scientific Professional Corps (ST Corps) and to demonstrate, through wider aware- ness, the impact these special people can make on our products for the warfighter.


ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES The ST Corps was created in 1998 to establish SES protocol-equivalent posi- tions to promote excellence in scientific and technical work through a long-term career path alternative to entering man- agement. The STs are the highest-ranking technical personnel, and their positions are the equivalent of chaired professors at leading research universities. The ST professional carries the following respon- sibilities within his or her organization:


• Serve as an advocate for the Army’s engi- neers, mathematicians, and scientists.


• Promote collaborative research and technical interchange with scientists


e don’t hear much about these people because they are modest, and their positions are not as well-


and scientific organizations external to the Army at both national and interna- tional levels.


• Encourage participation in external scientific and technical meetings, symposia, and publications, and sup- port collaboration among DOD and its services.


• Advocate actions and policies that maintain the stability of basic and applied research, technology develop- ment, and technology base programs within the Army.


• Advise and consult on technical matters to the Army’s civilian and military exec- utives and other government agencies.


• Provide a catalyst for change in research programs, research organi- zational structure, and planning for future science.


• Perform voluntary, self-imposed func- tions related to the collective expertise of the ST Corps that aid the Army and the United States of America.


The ST Corps is chaired by one of its members. This corps provides a forum for interaction among members to exchange ideas, plan activities, and per- petuate the organization.


An important additional ST Corps activity not widely known is the technical assess- ment that drives recommendations for the Small Business Innovative Research Program within the Army.


QUALIFICATIONS The qualifications to be considered for an ST position, which is generally referred to as the chief scientist for the organization, are the following:


• Has authored fundamental papers in the field of expertise that are widely used and cited.


• Has received significant honors from major organizations for his or her accomplishments and contributions.


• Is sought as an advisor and consultant on scientific and technological problems that extend beyond his or her specialty.


These qualifications put the ST in a posi- tion both to continue advanced technical work and to offer respected technical perspective to the organization’s SES lead- ership. The ideal laboratory or technical center leadership construct has the ST serving as a senior trusted advisor to the director on strategic issues related to the


THE IDEAL LABORATORY OR TECHNICAL CENTER LEADERSHIP CONSTRUCT HAS THE ST SERVING AS A SENIOR TRUSTED


ADVISOR TO THE DIRECTOR ON STRATEGIC ISSUES RELATED TO THE TECHNICAL WORKFORCE, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT OF EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES.


A S C . A RMY.MI L 65


SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136