search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GROUND TRUTH


COMPETITIVE PROTOTYPING CAN LOWER COSTS Shown here is the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) produced by Oshkosh Truck Corp., one of the vendors for the JLTV program’s EMD phase, along with AM General LLC and Lockheed Martin Corp. Among the Army’s lessons learned on collaborating with industry is to consider having multiple vendors compete to build prototypes dur- ing the EMD phase. Even though this is likely to require more government time and money up front, it has lowered costs across the life cycle of at least one program. (U.S. Army photo)


• Allowing the PM to assume control of communicating pro- gram requirements to lessen rumors, untruths and third-party feedback.


• Allowing early industry buy-in.


LL_230: Programs are most effective in working with ven- dors when a program adopts practices and expectations that are familiar to vendors.


Background When a program is acquiring commercial items, vendors can be strategic partners. Relationships with key vendors can take many forms. One program adopted a rule to resist modifications to selected commercial items and asked the vendor to make a change only if it made sense commercially. Te vendor checked on the viability of any enhancements by asking other buyers. Tis program was able to influence, rather than direct, the vendor. Other programs found that including vendors as part of inte- grated product teams helped foster a more trusting partnership among the vendor, contractor and PMO.


Te relationship between the program and the vendor is, in most instances, very different from the relationship with a contrac- tor, and PMs frequently overestimate the impact they can have on vendors. While contract incentives shape the relationship with a contractor, the vendor is selling a product—not program- unique services. However, programs have been successful


in


influencing product changes. In one case, a program worked as part of a users group to influence other customers to sup- port changes needed by DOD, and the vendor implemented the widely supported changes. On the other hand, some PMs have been convinced that changes to commercial items would be included in subsequent commercial releases. In several cases, the custom enhancements never became part of the commercial item; the PMs had to choose whether to maintain a unique ver- sion of the commercial item or redesign the system without the modifications.


Recommendation To strengthen program, contractor and vendor relationships:


• Verify vendor and contractor claims for commercial items. • Verify the availability of commercial items.


24 Army AL&T Magazine July-September 2016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184