search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
From the Editor-in-Chief T @


Email Nelson McCouch III ArmyALT@gmail.com


BACK TALK


Let us know how well we are meeting your needs. Send an email to ArmyALT@gmail.com.


For more news,


information and articles, please go to the USAASC website at


http://asc.army.mil. Click on the Publications tab at the top of the page.


he relationship between the government and industry should not be like the child’s game of “telephone line.” If you remem- ber, telephone line is the game where you


start a word or phrase at one end of the room and each person whispers it only once to the next person, and so on, until it reaches the last person in the room.


Te whole point of the game, and the fun of it, is that what started as a perfectly sensible statement, such as, “Te Army needs new vehicles,” ends up, by the time the last kid in the room interprets it, transmogri- fied into something completely nonsensical like, “Te marmalade has hiccups.”


Of course, telephone line is just a game, but in defense acquisition’s not-too-distant past, it has seemed at times that breakdowns in communication between government and industry became their own version of that childhood game. Te government drafts a requirement for what it thinks is a simple system but doesn’t keep industry well-informed on what exactly it needs, and the end product becomes the stuff of congressional inquiries, vitriolic hearings and night- marish scandal.


Collaborating with industry is not tantamount to President Dwight Eisenhower’s ominous military- industrial complex, perceived by many as the informal alliance between the nation’s military and the defense industry and the source of Eisenhower’s concern that industry would gain undue sway over defense policy— prompting him to warn government to “guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence” by industry.


In fact, collaborating with industry is quite the oppo- site. If we don’t bring industry to the table more frequently and ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of what the buyer (the government) wants and what industry (the maker) can create, then we risk wasting hard-earned taxpayer money and not getting Soldiers the equipment they need to prevail against the enemy.


Working closely with industry is especially important if the Army is going to achieve DOD’s third offset strategy—its plan to maintain U.S. technological


superiority over its rivals by investing in specific research areas like man-machine teaming, autono- mous learning systems and semiautonomous weapon systems. To be successful, this must be done in sync with industry. Te National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, currently awaiting reconcilia- tion between the House and Senate versions, gives the services flexible funding to encourage experimenta- tion and prototyping.


Partnering with industry is nothing new, but how we partner today versus how we did it just a few years ago is like night and day, partly because of changes imposed by DOD’s Better Buying Power (BBP) initiative, partly because of legislation (such as the FY17 defense autho- rization bill), and partly because of creative thinking by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology and our pro- gram executive offices. Tese initiatives and more are on full display in this issue.


Learn how a competitive nondevelopmental item approach to procuring the latest tactical radio tech- nology is saving the developer time and money while ensuring that the radio is compatible with govern- ment-owned waveforms, in “Network Marketplace: Open for Business” (in Acquisition). Also, big data is big business. See how government is partnering with the software industry to develop standards for interoperability, encourage vendors to develop appli- cations and avoid proprietary technologies in “Open Source Big Data” (in the BBP 3.0 section). Finally, get schooled with the U.S. Army Research Labora- tory’s (ARL’s) Open Campus experiment in “Ten and Now,” and see how the open campus builds on the relationships ARL has forged among government, academia and industry to develop technologies for the warfighter.


Te magazine’s sole purpose is to share information among acquisition professionals. Sometimes, its mis- sion is also to honor those who help us in that sharing, so be sure to take a look at “Recognizing the Best” on Page 167. As always, if you have questions, comments or just a great idea for an upcoming story, please send me a note at ArmyALT@gmail.com. I look forward to hearing from you.


Nelson McCouch III Editor-in-Chief


+ ASC.ARMY.MIL 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184