TALENT MANAGEMENT


contracts or agreements with industry to develop innovative simulation and train- ing technology. Technology development is limited to problem sets with a military application that the commercial market otherwise would not develop. Te second is the transition of technology to industry partners for commercialization, and the third is entering into exchange agreements, including cooperative research and devel- opment agreements, to enable research or development efforts with mutual benefits to both parties.


Academic partnerships include the University of Central Florida Institute for Simulation and Training, which supports STE technology development and inde- pendent technology assessment; the University of Southern California’s Insti- tute for Creative Technologies, which supports One World Terrain research; Carnegie Mellon University, which devel- ops artificial intelligence “free-thinking threat” algorithms; and the University of Texas, which develops One World Terrain and Training Simulation Software tech- nologies.


Key partnerships with other government organizations


STE include close relation-


ships with the STE Cross-Functional Team, PEO STRI and the Combined Arms Center-Training. The


Cross-Functional Team oversees develop- ment and sets requirements and priorities for STE and related activities. PEO STRI is the materiel developer of STE and primary transition recipient of the newly developed technologies. Te U.S. Army Combined Arms Center-Training iden- tifies the mid- and long-term gaps for the Army Simulation and Training Program. Other government partner- ships include cross-collaboration within CCDC’s internal centers and labs, and with technical experts at the Engineer Research and Development Center,


Army Geospatial Center and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.


We also maintain active relationships with international partners, including data and information exchange agreements with seven nations, future project agreements with two nations, one exchange engineer or scientist and participation in interna- tional standard activities with NATO, and the Technical Cooperation Program.


CONCLUSION Current and emerging technologies from the Army’s research centers and the virtual, gaming, data storage and network industries are enabling us to provide more accessible and realistic training for Soldiers. Te Army is leveraging these advances in technology, as well as the experience of the warfighter, to provide a training capability that accelerates Soldier and unit readiness to win decisively in multidomain operations.


For more information, go to www.army.mil/ccdc.


MAJ. GEN. JOHN A. GEORGE is the commanding general of CCDC. Before assuming command on Nov. 1, he served as deputy director and chief of staff of the U.S. Army Futures Command Futures and Concepts Center. He graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point and was commissioned into the Army in 1988. He has an M.S. in social psychology from Penn State University and an M.S. in national resource strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces.


The goal is to mature and demonstrate augmented reality algorithms and techniques that occlude dynamic objects in


realistic, changing environments.


https://asc.ar my.mil


17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104