search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


To that point, the FAR encourages what it calls early exchanges of information that may take the form of pre-solicitation notices, business fairs, pre-bid or pre-proposal conferences, and the availability of draft solicitations or draft specifications for review.


basis after issuing a pre-solicitation notice, but before expressions of interest from the notice were received. Te GAO sustained the protest by Barnes Aerospace Group (B-298864.2), explaining that “agen- cies undercut their credibility when they prepare and execute sole-source J&As on the basis that there is only one responsible source available, before the time they have received expressions of interest and capa- bility from potential offerors. Te entire purpose of issuing notices seeking expres- sions of interest and capability is to avoid the need for such sole-source procure- ments, if possible.”


Te government assumes a risk by proceed- ing with an action to limit competition without considering expressions of inter- est and capability from potential offerors. First, we risk depriving our programs of industry innovation; second, we risk losing the benefits of a competitive market.


We also assume a risk when we consider issuing notice of a contract action as friv- olous or a formality.


For example, in 2018, the U.S. Depart- ment of Labor published a notice of its intent to award a sole-source contract and invited companies to submit a capability statement.


However, one day after publishing the notice, the contracting officer signed the J&A and awarded the sole-source contract.


Career Systems Development Corp. protested (B-416021.2) the sole-source contract. It stated that the Department of Labor (DOL) had failed to consider the company’s capability statement that was submitted in response to the DOL’s notice. Te DOL claimed, however, that the notice inviting firms to submit capa- bility statements was a “mere formality” and that consideration of the protest- er’s capability statement was “actually irrelevant.”


GAO disagreed, explaining that the agency’s responsibility to consider the protester’s capability statement is not a “mere formality” and determined that DOL’s actions were contrary to regula- tion, rendering the J&A and the resulting sole-source contract deficient.


CONCLUSION DFARS requires the contracting offi- cer to publish a request for information or sources sought when using the “one responsible source” exception to full and open competition. Accurate use of pre- solicitation notices—as well as a walk through the valley of the acquisition regulations to understand the nature of a synopsis, request for information, sources-sought and notice of proposed contract action—facilitates our procure- ment objectives, supports advance procurement planning and enhances market research toward fulfilling our mission objectives.


For more information on notice of a proposed contract action and its impact on competition in contracting, go to the Procurement.Army.Mil Training Library at the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Procurement website at https://spcs3. kc.army.mil/asaalt/procurement/SiteP- ages/NewTraining.aspx.


DENNIS P. LONGO is advocate for competition, task and delivery order ombudsman, and senior procurement analyst at the U.S. Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. A member of the Army Acquisition Corps, he holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Baltimore, and is Level III certified in contracting. His assignments include acquisition specialist at the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization within the U.S. Army Chemical Materials Activity and procurement analyst at the U.S. Army Legal Services Agency. He served in the Army from 1971 to 1973 at the Southern European Task Force, Italy, and was deployed to Iraq as a civilian in 2003. He authored the Defense Acquisition University Continuous Learning DOD Purchase Card Tutorial in 2003, and has been teaching courses on competition in contracting since 2004. Te first of the author’s On Contracting articles, “How to Convince the Army to Get What You Need,” appeared in the Winter 2020 edition of Army AL&T.


https://asc.ar my.mil


63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104