search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GREEN ARMY TECH


THE CONVERSION PROCESS


Chart shows the conversion of Ammonium Nitrate Solution (ANSol) into Potassium Nitrate (KNO3), which addresses supply chain vulnerabilities and contributes to sustainability efforts. (Graphic by Gregory O’Connor, JPEO A&A – Project Director Joint Services and USAASC)


the optimal neutralizing agent and identifying the optimal waste stream feedstock for potassium nitrate manufacture. It also included laboratory-scale reactions to assess scalability and safety. Te results of Phase I demonstrated successful synthesis of approximately 10 pounds of recrystallized potassium nitrate product from ammonium nitrate solution, along with the iden- tification of the optimal process parameters.


Phase II focused on scaling up the process to produce 350 pounds of potassium nitrate. Tis phase involved utilizing a larger pilot- scale reactor and incorporating the potassium nitrate into a flash suppressant formulation. Te resulting potassium nitrate prod- uct was characterized and compared to military specification requirements. Te successful completion of Phase II led to the formulation of the potassium nitrate product into a flash suppres- sant. Te findings from Phases I and II have paved the way for further scale-up and optimization. Phase III will develop an implementation plan for a larger scale process to maximize the value of waste streams in munitions production.


CONCLUSION Overall, the project has successfully demonstrated the feasibil- ity and merit of turning waste into valuable products within the Army’s munitions production process. Te successful conver- sion of ammonium nitrate solution into potassium nitrate not


only addresses supply chain vulnerabilities but also contributes to sustainability efforts by reducing waste disposal, reliance on external sources and exemplifies the Army’s commitment to a greener future. Additional work is currently underway analyz- ing the potential of processing ammonium nitrate solution into strontium nitrate and barium nitrate, as well as exploring other manufacturing waste streams for synthesis of potassium sulfate, all of which are chemicals used by DOD. By integrating environ- mental sustainability and waste reuse into GOCO production facilities, the Army can reduce its environmental footprint while becoming a more resilient organic ammunition industrial base.


For more information, contact Gregory O’Connor at gregory.j.oconnor.civ@army.mil or 973-724-5008.


GREGORY O’CONNOR is the government-owned contractor- operated modernization manager within the Project Director Joint Services. He did postgraduate work in systems engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology, holds an M.S. in environmental chemistry from New Jersey Institute of Technology and a B.S. in environmental chemistry from Delaware Valley University. He received executive certificates from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Pennsylvania and Cornell University.


https://asc.ar my.mil


25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124