search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GREEN ARMY TECH


CLOSED DISPOSAL


Example of a Closed Disposal Technology at McAlester Army Ammunition Plant in Oklahoma. Pictured here are the McAlester Ammunition Peculiar Equipment (APE) 1236 Rotary Kiln Incinerator thermal treatment system and the Munitions Cryo- Fracture Demilitarization Facility, which prepares munitions for feeding into the APE1236 for demilitarization. (Photo by Brent Hunt, Tooele Army Depot)


Tis will include determining where alter- native technologies will be installed and how the projects will be executed. Both an acquisition strategy and a funding plan also will be developed, and from this an implementation timeline will be estab- lished. Construction usually requires funding from DOD’s Military Construc- tion program and is a lengthy process to receive and implement. Te demilitariza- tion enterprise is requesting Procurement of Ammunition Army (PAA) funding on Product Director Demilitarization’s EP1700 funding line during the recent fiscal year 2026-30 Program Objective Memorandum funding requests. An act of Congress would be required to allow PAA funds to be used for construction, alternate technology or otherwise.


CONCLUSION In the 1980s, regulations allowed the permitting of open burning and open detonation to demilitarize munitions. On May 19, 1980, 45 Federal Regis- ter 33063-33285, page 33217, allowed


the open burning and open detona- tion of waste explosives, within specified distance and weight limitations, during an interim status permitting period. On Dec. 10, 1987, in 52 Federal Register 46.946, 46.949-50, 46.957-58, the EPA concluded that facilities conducting open burning and open detonation of waste explosives would receive permits under the RCRA Subpart X provisions as miscellaneous units. Since then, DOD has been proac- tively reducing the number of permitted open burning and open detonation units from 114 to 34, a 70% reduction. More- over, DOD facilities reduced the quantity of munitions treated by open burning and open detonation by 58% over the past 20 years.


Te demilitarization industrial base is currently facing both technological and funding constraints in the implementation of additional closed disposal technology solutions. By developing a comprehensive acquisition strategy and funding plan, it will enable Army leaders to make informed


decisions on the necessity and urgency of funding future demilitarization technol- ogy projects.


For more information, email the author at james.c.terhune2.civ@army.mil.


JAMES TERHUNE is the product director


demilitarization within


the


Project Director Joint Services. He holds an M.S. in technology management from the Stevens Institute of Technology and a B.S. in industrial engineering from Lehigh University. He is a 2021 graduate of the Defense Acquisition University Senior Service College Fellowship. He is certified as Advanced in program management and as Practitioner in engineering and technical management and business – financial management.


https://asc.ar my.mil


29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124