search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


the Phase 2 awardees on Aug. 30, 2023, following the final presentation.


XTech employed proprietary software to ensure fairness and transparency in the evaluation process. This stream- lined approach, which could eliminate biases and normalize results, rendered the competition process as objective and effi- cient. In addition, the vendors received feedback from the judges, as part of the evaluation process, to help them improve future proposal submissions.


Te winners of Phase 2, each receiving a $300,000 prize, were announced on Sept. 7, 2023, marking yet another milestone in this transformative journey.


For Phase 3, the winners from Phase 2 will get an opportunity to demonstrate their PGS final proof-of-concept solution to the government. Te winner of Phase 3 poten- tially could be awarded up to $2 million in a follow-on contract or agreement.


Vendors answered the request for feedback regarding the xTech PGS competition. Tis was especially true for small busi- nesses, which enthusiastically encouraged the Army to continue leveraging this authority. Te xTech platform allowed and incentivized them to invest in technolo- gies, aligning with PM SL’s original goals. Moreover, vendors praised the competi- tion’s ease of entry, relieving them of the need to invest in specialized proposal-writ- ing teams familiar with navigating the complex FAR and DFARS requirements and procedures.


The results were nothing short of extraordinary.


CONCLUSION Te partnership between PM SL and xTech has ushered in a new era of innovation within DOD. By harnessing the power of the 10 U.S.C. § 4025 prize authority and working closely with xTech, PM SL has successfully ignited industry interest in the PGS program, breaking down the barriers that often stifle innovation in the defense sector.


Tis collaboration has streamlined the competition process, as well as advance- ments in unique technologies, allowing small vendors to compete alongside their larger counterparts and fostering an environment where groundbreaking technologies can thrive. As the partner- ship between PM SL and xTech continues to evolve, it stands as a model for future defense innovation efforts. By embrac- ing nontraditional methods, eliminating biases and simplifying the entry process, this partnership promises a brighter, more collaborative future for the defense industry.


As the defense community looks toward the future, the success of the PM SL-xTech collaboration serves as a testament to what can be achieved when government enti- ties and innovative platforms join forces. Te lessons learned from this partnership will undoubtedly inform best practices for future endeavors, guiding program exec- utive offices and their workforces toward more efficient, innovative and collab- orative approaches to meeting DOD’s evolving needs.


In an era marked by rapidly advancing technology and complex security chal- lenges, leveraging innovative approaches and fostering collaboration with industry partners is critical. Trough the xTech Competitive Platform and the 10 U.S.C. § 4025 prize authority, PM SL has connected with nontraditional defense industry and


laid the groundwork for a more resilient and responsive defense ecosystem. Tis, in turn, will play a pivotal role in ensur- ing the readiness and effectiveness of our armed forces, both now and in the future.


For more information, go to https:// www.xtech.army.mil/competition/ xtechsoldier-lethality.


ANDREW H. CLINE is project officer for PGS. He holds an M.S. in management science from Florida Institute of Technology and a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Rhode Island. He is a DAWIA Certified Practitioner in engineering and technical management and in program management.


MAJ. ERIC B. FORSGREN is an assistant product manager for PM SL Soldier Weapons. He holds an M.S. in systems


engineering management from Webber from


the Naval Postgraduate School and a B.S. in business administration sport management


International


University. He holds a Defense Financial Management Level 2 Certification from DOD Financial Management and a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Certification from U.S.


Army Lean Six Sigma.


TRAVIS T. JAMES is an acquisition analyst for PM SL and spearheaded the prize authority use outlined in 10 U.S.C. § 4025 with xTech. He holds a B.S. in business administration and management from Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania. He holds a Professional certification in DOD contracting.


CONTRIBUTOR: Luke A. Graziani is a public affairs specialist for PM SL.


https://asc.ar my.mil


95


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124