search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


T


he Army expects future large-scale combat operations to be fast-paced and complex, with forces combating a variety of harsh terrains and environments, under constant enemy observation and attack.


Two intertwined capabilities underpin a commander’s ability to overcome the demands of such chaotic conflicts: the network and the command and control (C2) systems that run on it. Together they provide commanders and their maneuver formations with the assured voice and data exchange, common operational picture and access to offensive and defensive digital fires needed to combat rapidly changing operational environments.


To be survivable in future dynamic large-scale combat operations, instead of tethered to large, static, equipment-laden command posts, commanders and their C2 systems need to be on-the-move.


“If you watch the news and [look at] the lessons learned from all the operations we’re assigned to, [it’s apparent that] we can’t continue to have this huge command post and be survivable,” said Brig. Gen. Marne Sutten, deputy chief of staff G-6, Army Forces Command, during the latest Army Technical Exchange Meeting (TEM) with government and industry partners. “Commanders want a command post that they can utilize at the time of their choosing … to give them the flexibility” they need to conduct different missions.


During theDecember 2023 TEM 11 in Savannah, Georgia, Army leaders discussed current efforts to design a network architec- ture that addresses the ever-increasing need for C2 on-the-move. Tey stressed the importance of aligning technology, people and processes to achieve the overarching unified network needed for resilient data exchange. Te goal is also to make network and C2 systems more intuitive and easier to use, while reducing footprint and lowering electromagnetic signature.


“[To be] survivable, we need to be transport agnostic,” said Col. Rob McChrystal, commander of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment, during TEM 11. “I’m talking about redundancy and maximum options, whether it’s transport from the terrestrial layer to multiple types of low Earth orbit to medium Earth orbit to geosynchro- nous Earth orbit [satellite communications]. We need to have those options, and ultimately, we want to get to the point where that's automated, and we’re able to auto transition when they fail.”


McChrystal emphasized several key characteristics he needs for his formation to fight mobile and dispersed. Tese include enhancing survivability through a transport-agnostic network


design that maximizes and automates numerous signal trans- port options; and smaller, more flexible systems that can adapt to different missions. Interoperability with joint and multina- tional mission partners plays a critical role, he said, as well as the need to be data-enabled, with a nonproprietary, easily inte- grated data fabric. Looking forward, predictive data to support commanders’ decision-making—leveraging capabilities such as human-machine teaming, automated running estimates and simulations—will be imperative to a future fight against a peer or near-peer adversary, he said.


“Tis is important because of the pace of technological change,” McChrystal said. “Tat means we have to understand faster; we have to understand risks; we have to understand opportunities faster and we have to make faster decisions.”


Te Army is looking to its industry partners to help it reach its C2 on-the-move network goal and will welcome both program- matic and technical input to help design capabilities that increase survivability, provide flexibility and deliver network resiliency for commanders to fight disaggregated or collected regardless of geographic or mission constraints.


REQUIREMENTS The Army command post directed requirement describes command and control on-the-move as moving or rapid halts in minutes. To meet these requirements, the service must integrate C2 information systems and physical infrastructure to execute core C2 functions. C2 on-the-move systems need to be modu- lar and adaptable based on the different needs of each echelon, formation type, mission and operational environment.


“Te command post is just the physical space in which the commander and staff conduct the functions or command and control and doesn’t have to be any specific … location,” said Col. Charles Ford, Army capability manager for mission command/ command posts within the Mission Command Capability Devel- opment Integration Directorate. “It doesn’t always have to be in the vehicle. It might be in a garage, it might be in a farmhouse, it might be just dispersed on a city block. We want to be modu- lar and adaptable.”


Te goal is the continuity of command and control, to ensure a resilient network transport that can rapidly recover from signal loss and degradation, and maximize both effectiveness and surviv- ability, Ford said. “We often hear this false dichotomy: If you’re survivable, you’re not effective. If you’re effective, you’re static. We need to balance them, so they can both grow together.”


https://asc.ar my.mil 73


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124