search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


Full and open competition is the rule of the Competition in Contracting Act when soliciting offers for government contracts.


approval unreasonably relied on a finding that the classified information to which L3 has access could not be shared with other contractors. Boeing pointed out in its protest that it had the personnel and facilities to receive the classified informa- tion and further pointed out that classified work it had performed for the government on previous contracts involved informa- tion classified at levels far higher than the secret level applied to the levels applied to the justification and approval.


The GAO denied Boeing’s protest regarding the justification and approval, concluding that the Air Force reasonably made a need-to-know determination that precluded the transfer of classified infor- mation to an additional contractor. See B-414706; B-414380.2, Aug 25, 2017.


Persons are allowed access to classified information only if they (1) possess a valid and appropriate security clearance, (2) have executed an appropriate nondis- closure agreement, (3) have a valid need to know the information in order to perform a lawful and authorized govern- ment function. According to AR 380-5, Army personnel are personally responsi- ble for determining that all three are true.


It is a fallacy to believe that just because someone has a clearance means they have a need to know. Need to know is a deter- mination made by an authorized holder of classified information that a prospective recipient requires access to specific clas- sified information in order to perform or assist in a lawful and authorized govern- mental function.


Need-to-know provisions may preclude the clearance of additional sources for the purpose of solicitation and perfor- mance of work, even to those sources that might possess access to information classi- fied at equivalent or higher levels on other programs.


When limiting competition based on the national security exception and need-to- know provisions apply, the justification and approval must explain the need-to- know restriction when access to classified information to commercial sources is fundamental to contract performance and disclosure of classified information is limited on a need-to-know basis.


CONCLUSION Fallaciously invoking the national security exception to limit full and open competi- tion comes with risk of expending agency resources and delays in awarding and executing contracts.


Limiting competition for federal contract- ing opportunities based on national security isn’t solely a matter of keep- ing secrets safe, but by recognizing what actions or omissions may or may not constitute a compromise of national secu- rity when soliciting for the government’s procurement needs.


Te security classification guide is the primary document that identifies and regulates disclosure of classified infor- mation for purposes of soliciting bids or proposals. Understanding need-to- know requirements before disclosing the government’s classified procurement


requirements will avoid an unlimited and unauthorized release of classified infor- mation to any potential offeror that may possess a clearance level equivalent to the information being disclosed.


For more information, view the Competi- tion in Army Contracting course at https:// go.usa.gov/xvy7z. This Common Access Card.


site requires a


DENNIS P. LONGO is the advocate for competition, task and delivery order ombudsman


and senior procurement


analyst for Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. A member of the Army Acquisition Corps, he holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Baltimore and is Level III certified in contracting. His assignments include acquisition specialist at the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization within the U.S. Army Chemical Materials Activity and procurement analyst at U.S. Army Legal Services Agency. He served in the military from 1971 to 1973 at the Southern European Task Force,


Italy,


and was deployed to Iraq as a civilian in 2003. He authored the DAU Continuous Learning DOD Purchase Card Tutorial in 2002 and the DASA (P) Competition in Army Contracting course in 2019 and the Defense Acquisition University CON 0160 Competition in Contracting


course. He


has been teaching courses on competition in contracting since 2004. Te first of the author's On Contracting articles appeared in the Winter 2020 edition of Army AL&T.


https://asc.ar my.mil


113


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176