search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
$


RESTRUCTURED HUSKY Capturing lessons learned from equipment fielded under a JUONS for operations in Afghanistan, PEO Ammunition restructured the Husky Mounted Detection System program. The restructured pro- gram will achieve an estimated $84 million savings over the program objective memorandum and more than $1 billion of cost avoidance over the life cycle of the system. (U.S. Army photo)


more than $1 billion of cost avoidance over the life cycle of the system.


For more information, contact Vince Dah- men at vincent.k.dahmen.civ@mail. mil or 973-724-9605.


PEO GCS HUNTS FOR FUTURE SAVINGS Te 2009 National Defense Authoriza- tion Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2009 added a new requirement that each service establish a configuration steering board (CSB)


for all post-Milestone B major


defense acquisition programs. Te goal is to control costs of major programs by cre- ating a framework for program managers to work with the user community and


key stakeholders across their respective services. Te CSB is intended to provide them a venue to make recommendations to their service acquisition executives and vice chiefs of staff on whether to modify, delete or defer requirements.


PEO Ground Combat Systems (GCS) holds CSBs annually to ensure that each Acquisition Category 1 program delivers as much capability as possible, while pre- venting any changes that could adversely impact program cost or schedule. CSBs also allow for rigorous analysis of the potential de-scoping of outdated require- ments, which could drive down program costs


and deliver warfighter faster. capabilities to the


In late FY12, PEO GCS convened a CSB that ultimately led to modifying, deleting or deferring 43 requirements from across the combat vehicle portfolio. Te result was approximately $4 billion in cost sav- ings and avoidance; about $3.8 billion represented cost avoidance. Subsequent CSBs may not be able to replicate this level of success, as it is not always possible to find such significant cost savings and avoidance.


Tat said, “CSBs are an invaluable


resource, as they allow us to have can- did discussions with our stakeholders in the requirements and resources com- munities about where our platforms are headed,” said Scott Davis, former PEO


ASC.ARMY.MIL 159


BBP 2.0


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200