search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MOVE ASIDE


Eliminating disparate systems on the MMVP Type II variant of the MRAP, shown here during route clearance training in June 2018 at Fort Drum, New York, means that each operator can have access to all of the sensors on the vehicle from the display at his or her station. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Avery Cunningham, 172nd Public Affairs Detachment)


THE INITIAL DESIGN Te Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) family of vehicles, which includes the MMVP Type II, provides Soldiers with highly survivable, multimission platforms capable of mitigating improvised explo- sive devices, rocket-propelled grenades, explosively formed penetrators, under- body mines and small arms fire threats, which produce the greatest number of casualties in overseas contingency oper- ations. However, earlier versions of the vehicles had disparate systems for each vehicle operator or combat engineer, such as the driver, the second-seat operator for night vision, the gunner who controls the remote turret gun, and other opera- tors managing various functions of the MMVP Type II, sensors, interrogation arm and a semiautonomous robot.


Each crew member has a separate mission, which meant no crew member had access to what the others were seeing and oper- ating. If one were incapacitated for any reason, the others could not take over that person’s role without leaving their console. As well, each user interface was specific to that station—meaning that another crew member might not immediately be


able to operate another’s console interface when needed.


By moving from disparate systems on the platform for each operator in the MMVP Type II vehicle, each could work at his or her crew station with access to all of the sensors on the vehicle, including video sensors and even the tactical Single Chan- nel Ground and Airborne Radio System. With the MVD software presenting a consistent, modular user interface to all crew stations, any operator can perform the functions of or get access to the func- tions of any other crew station. (See Figure 1, Page 121.) Tis helps balance workload and increases situational awareness, as additional eyes can see each video feed and sensor input on any display.


CONNECTING THE SYSTEMS Tese kinds of modern military systems present significant challenges. To make the MVD system possible requires networked, high-performance, interconnected smart display systems, sensors, video processors and a server mounted inside the MMVP Type II vehicles on which to run the Army-created software. Tis software is hardware-independent and uses a modu- lar, plug-in-based VICTORY-conformant


Army architecture—meaning new enabler systems can be added without modifying the existing code. One goal was eliminat- ing the stovepiped nature of individual systems that do not interoperate or inter- communicate.


Te first challenge was technical. Tradi- tionally, disparate systems come from different contractors and, almost by defi- nition, are not interoperable. For many reasons, including bidding, contract and development times, military systems are typically deployed using computer technology that is one or two (or more) generations behind what is offered in current consumer devices. Tis MVD application, however, required the process- ing of extremely high volumes of video encoded as data messages with very mini- mal delay (low-latency processing), which demanded the best-available and latest- generation technology from the civilian world. For example, servers running Intel’s latest processors were needed; however, they are not battle-hardened.


From the operator’s standpoint, delays of as little as a single video frame from when something happens outside the vehicle to when it’s displayed on the


HTTPS: / /ASC.ARMY.MIL 119


COMMENTARY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152