search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PRIME PARTNERSHIP


user interface can cause motion sick- ness, because the images lag behind what the operator’s body is feeling in the vehi- cle. Tat meant the technology required to take input from the sensors, process it and then display it on the networked crew workstations in near-real time demanded today’s highest-performance digital signal processing capabilities.


ENTER GMS Another challenge for this MVD program was an extremely tight budget. If it couldn’t be completed within the budget, it wouldn’t happen—leaving warfighters without advanced mine-clearing capa- bilities. As described in the previously referenced article, NVESD decided that using multiple vendors for differ- ent system components made hitting the budget target impossible. In addition, it seemed likely that using the traditional subcontractor-prime contractor mecha- nism would add unnecessary cost. Te only way this project could be completed


within budget was to have one vendor supply all the necessary hardware compo- nents and also informally advise on the system integration architecture.


NVESD had several hardware choices to complete the original prototype—from a rackmount server to a rugged work- station. With funding for a commercial off-the-shelf upfront design and improved in-vehicle architecture, GMS provided a proof-of-concept version of its rugged, conduction-cooled server while help- ing the Army decide that converting the sensor data to video-over-Internet Proto- col packets on a network was a scalable approach to the system problem.


As the Army demonstrated the system for early feedback, requirements evolved, and GMS was able to add more capability and expand functionality, ultimately help- ing complete the initial proof-of-concept program on budget.


EARLY DEVELOPMENT PHASE As the program evolved from concept phase and through multiple early demon- strations,


the company and NVESD


SCREEN TIME The new MVD,


installed in an MMPV Type


II, was tested by Soldiers with the 36th Engineer Brigade at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. By partnering with GMS to imple- ment modular servers and displays, NVESD was able to field a system that integrates full-motion video from all sources at all vehi- cle crew stations into a single, unified user interface on each display. (U.S. Army photo by Maj. Jason E. Carney, U.S. Army Oper- ational Test Command Public Affairs)


began working more on the remaining design challenges. Tis included transi- tioning each of the system components from laboratory-grade prototypes to full military-standard, conduction-cooled, production components capable of oper- ating at minimal cost in the extreme environments of the MMVP Type II. Performance requirements also evolved, and as GMS migrated its standard product servers from one generation to the next in response to market conditions, the MVD system was able to take advantage of those gains while still using GMS commercially available, rugged off-the-shelf hardware.


As GMS evolved its hardware, the Army continued writing its own software while preparing for the eventual integration


120 Army AL&T Magazine January-March 2019


into the vehicle, a process typically left to a prime contractor. At some point in the program’s evolution, the Army had decided that not only would the addi- tion of a traditional prime contractor add unnecessary expense to the program (and likely push it out of budget), but that it would be the Army that integrated and installed the MVD system into MMVP Type II vehicles.


From that point, the Army, following protocol, put the design out for bid in its usual process. While competitors to GMS were considered—weighing factors such as lead time, price, performance and decades of building similar rugged, high-density, high-performance conduction-cooled systems—in every case, NVESD deter- mined that the GMS system was the best choice and awarded GMS the prime contract in an open competition. Instead of working through a prime—which would have added cost—making GMS the prime contractor allowed the Army to purchase complete and assembled kits with cables and final documentation. Te Army would do the integration and instal- lation into the vehicle.


Interestingly, even as the Army started the final, open bidding process, the require- ments evolved again, requiring bidders and GMS to add performance into the system to meet the new requirements. For example, because the GMS architec- ture is modular, meaning it is built using standardized “compute engines” that can be independently implemented in differ- ent systems, GMS was able to add media converter channels and upgrade from a previous-generation Intel server proces- sor to the Intel Xeon E5 server processor. As described earlier, military systems are typically generations behind commercial technology, but this modular approach allows GMS’ mobile battlefield server in MMVP Type II to use the same processor


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152