search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MEDICAL PARTNERSHIP


PARTNERING FOR SUCCESS While USAMMDA does its part in the development of critical medical products moving through the acquisition pipeline, it relies heavily on commercial partners in industry to complete this important task. Kathleen Berst, USAMMDA’s deputy for acquisition, explained that the command seeks opportunities to part- ner with companies currently holding a technology that has a civilian market and is militarily relevant but not necessarily military-specific.


“Everything we do is driven by a requirement,” she said. “However, our requirement is probably not the only


driver of our industry partner’s devel- opment effort. So the question we ask ourselves is, ‘How do we integrate our requirement with the industry partner’s strategy to deliver a commercially viable product that is sustainable and meets the military’s need?’ ”


Berst pointed out the similarities between DOD’s business model and that of typical companies throughout the industry. “We both look at the same factors: How much will this cost? What is the need for this? What is the market? How long will it take to develop? What’s the programmatic risk? Te bottom line is that it’s an investment decision,” she said.


INTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS


When it comes to partnerships, those across the command are equally as important as the commercial ones established outside of the military for the advancement of critical products.


“USAMMDA has access to and the avail- ability of multiple contracts and sites to conduct the pivotal testing of vital Army medical products,” explained Lightner.


“For instance, with infectious diseases that are endemic in other countries of the world, we have command assets that include labs in Thailand and Kenya that have developed field sites to conduct clinical testing of products.


“Our DOD partners in these labs overseas are regionally focused and have access to populations that are directly affected by diseases we are trying to eliminate, so these locations remain extremely important with regard to product effec- tiveness testing,” he said.


Berst explained that, working within a relatively small budget, the Army must remain diligent in its investment decisions, so it considers partners with the greatest chances for success. DOD cannot create a militarily unique product that leaves the government as the only customer, as this would create the difficult scenario of having to solely sustain the product indef- initely.


Dr. Lawrence Lightner, project manager of USAMMDA’s Pharmaceutical Systems Project Management Office (PSPMO), which oversees the development of items including tafenoquine, the adenovirus vaccine and freeze-dried plasma, under- scored the critical role of contracting in the partnering process. He explained that a government contract provides a flexi- ble mechanism for using DOD funds to assist industry partners in a variety of areas. Te CRADA is a very important tool as well.


“Te CRADA essentially affords the DOD a seat at the table in contributing to deci- sions made by the industry partner,” said Lightner. “Under a CRADA, the indus- try partner may provide funding to


62 Army AL&T Magazine January-March 2019


DOD for specific activities, while DOD can provide other material items to the industry partner for the product devel- opment process.”


Te CRADA played an important part in the recent U.S. Food and Drug Admin- istration (FDA) approval of tafenoquine, which was realized after 40 years of research and development


involving


numerous partners. Malaria remains the top infectious disease threat to U.S. service members deployed overseas, and DOD has been committed to discovering an effective solution for the prevention and treatment of this life-threatening illness among its troops, as well as civil- ian populations worldwide.


Tafenoquine was first discovered in 1978 within the Experimental Terapeutics Branch at the Walter Reed Army Insti- tute of Research. In 1988, the drug was transitioned to USAMMDA’s PSPMO for management and oversight of the product development effort, and it has remained under the PSPMO’s guidance ever since. While many organizations have been involved in studying the drug, production of tafenoquine as a weekly prophylaxis was secured through the establishment of a CRADA between USAMMDA and its industry partner, 60° Pharmaceuticals LLC, which will manu- facture the drug for DOD.


Te result of this type of partnership is usually a win-win scenario: Te indus- try partner ends up with a commercially profitable product that DOD can purchase, generally at a reduced cost, for use throughout its military forces. As DOD cannot solely sustain a mili- tarily unique product for the sake of its warfighters, industry partnerships such as this are vital to maintain military read- iness and to provide medical product support. Although some exceptions exist


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152