search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IMPLEMENTING INNOVATION


the application process for DOD-funded grants, which would be the foundational “carrot” made available to incentivize local innovator involvement. Applica- tions for the grants would be received, reviewed by local National Guard lead- ership and competitively awarded based on programmatic criteria and TAG (the adjutant general, i.e., head of individual state National Guard forces) priorities. Te final step in the innovation officer’s duties would be to oversee the portfolio of small innovation grants after they are awarded to local innovators.


WALK THIS WAY


Maj. Harrison Bittenbender, right, State Partnership Program director, guides Maryland leaders around an airfield being used by Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina and U.S. Army National Guard Units, in exercise Immediate Response, part of the Defender 21 series in Tuzla, Bosnia-Herzegovina, “Old Eagle Base.” (Photo by Maryland National Guard)


A two-tiered grant system would provide the recommended primary structure for the program. Tier I grants would be valued at $50,000 to $100,000 and allo- cated proportionally by total personnel in a given state’s formation. Along with the grant, the recipient firm also would receive dedicated support, coordination and advocacy from that state’s National Guard, generating the “foot in the door” that small businesses often strug- gle to achieve with DOD. Allocating one grant to local companies per every 1,000 National Guard personnel is a reason- able ratio to use as a reference, though the actual apportioning of grants can be scaled based on budgetary or program- matic considerations. Te intent would be to draw from viable candidates across a given state, ensuring the focus remains on capturing potential utility for DOD.


PARTNER OPPORTUNITY


From left, Maj. Harrison Bittenbender, State Partnership Program director; Brig Gen. Adam Flasch, director of the joint staff for the Maryland National Guard; 1st Lt. Lucija Šimovi of the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina; Col. Zoran Batarilo, defense attaché of the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina; and Capt. Nick Boeh, State Partnership Program coordinator. (Photo by Maryland National Guard)


104


To be clear, Innovation Program grants would not equate to purchase orders, nor the program itself an alternate outlet for acquisitions. Instead, the combination of grant money and dedicated, sustained coordination between the military and the innovators would create DOD’s own geographically dispersed innovation incu- bator. Much like the government offering an internship to a matriculating student, there would be no commitment for the


Army AL&T Magazine Spring 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140