search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


FIGURE 1


Maintenance Free Operating Period


Failure Threshold


10 percent chance of failure


90 percent chance of success


future risk. With less variation in the predicted remaining useful life, a compo- nent will remain in service longer and the Army will see more benefits from PPMx.


Measurements Predicted Remaining Useful Life Flight Time SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT


Figure 1: Illustrates the probability of failure increasing with accumulation of wear during flight hours. (Graphic courtesy of the authors)


Risk mitigation is a core goal under PPMx. To maintain safety, most of the time the failure will never occur. For aircraft using PPMx in a maintenance-free operating period strategy, some near-but-not-yet- failed parts will be removed. In doing this, the maintainer is trading econom- ically useful life for uninterrupted flight operations. Tese parts would still be oper- ating in the prescribed limits, but will be removed because they are expected to fail before the next maintenance window.


As indicated by the blue hash area, the component has a 90 percent chance to remain functional by the end of the oper- ating period and, consequently, a 10 percent chance the component will fail. Te future risk is the product of this 10 percent probability and the criticality of the component. With this estimate of the future, a maintainer has the infor- mation necessary to make appropriate maintenance decisions today. If the risk is unacceptable, then the framework can be


queried for which components are driv- ing the risk over the acceptable threshold.


UNCERTAINTY IS COSTLY Under PPMx, the uncertainty about the remaining useful life adds complexity to the maintenance decision. Using the weather example, if the forecast gives a 40 percent chance of rain in five days, a trav- eler may pack an umbrella for a trip. Tus, the uncertainty about the prediction influ- ences actions today as we hedge against


Our inability to know the exact moment of component failure is quantified by the uncertainty. Te uncertainty about the health statement drives maintenance actions which then raise sustainment costs and keep availability low. Better diagnos- tic systems and prognostic models with reduced uncertainty maximize the use of the remaining useful life to save money and minimize mission disruption.


MODERNIZED THINKING PPMx is a concept that hinges on proba- bilities, yet thinking in probabilistic terms does not come naturally to humans. Te engineering community needs to strive to give accurate assessments of the risks, broken out into usable information. For example, the risks could be reported as


PPMx’s goal is to arm the maintenance manager with the information to make efficient decisions that avoid mission disruption and eliminate premature removal of components.


https://asc.ar my.mil 79


Probability of Failure


Recovery Period


1 percent


10 percent


10 percent


99 percent


90 percent


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140