A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMPETITION
HOW IT WORKS
The Tangi-Tek LLC team demonstrates its technology—carbon fiber composite materials that can improve antenna performance and reduce electromagnetic interference—to xTechSearch judges. From left are Tangi-Tek’s Adithya S. Ramachandran, co-founder and product development engineer; Kent G.R. Thompson, co-founder and principal engineer; and Dr. Robert L. Doneker, co- founder and president; and xTechSearch judges John Kincaid, U.S. Army Futures Command – Futures and Concepts Center; Dr. Augustus Fountain III, CCDC – Chemical Biological Center; Dr. Bryan Glaz, CCDC – ARL; and Maj. Katrina Patton, U.S. Army Futures Command – Futures and Concepts Center.
receive $250,000, and the 12 semifinalists for xTechSearch 3.0, who will each receive $120,000.
Over the last year, xTechSearch has evalu- ated more than 500 potential technologies and awarded $4.1 million in total prizes to 102 small businesses. Te competition has proven to be a viable mechanism to rapidly screen and assess technologies; a traditional request-for-proposal process may take six to nine months to evaluate just a handful of contractors.
Te modest prizes awarded to competi- tors in the first two phases are not only incentives to spur innovation, but they also function as working capital to help the companies—who are usually not particularly well-funded—take part in subsequent phases. Te decision to make the search into a prize competition was meant to help lower the bar to partic- ipation and take contracting out of the picture. Te Phase III awards are meant to provide funding to help the participants
10 Army AL&T Magazine Fall 2019
continue developing their technology and offset travel costs for the proof-of-concept demonstrations. Te grand prize is meant to help them further continue the devel- opment of their technology.
While the prizes are small by DOD stan- dards,
for many contestants they are
much-needed injections of funding. But when the competition is over, a frequent concern is, “What next?” Without a deal for their technology, what do competitors do to continue development? Te answer just may be a program enacted in the 1980s to encourage domestic small busi- nesses to engage in federal research and development: the Small Business Innova- tion Research (SBIR) program.
MUCH MORE THAN MONEY xTechSearch was designed to institution- alize an innovation ecosystem that fosters continued engagement between the Army and small businesses. As part of the xTech- Search program, the competitors receive mentoring on the Army’s research and
development (R&D) process, its labo- ratories and technology-transfer and partnership opportunities.
For instance, xTechSearch invites repre- sentatives from the Army’s Office of Small Business Programs and technology trans- fer experts from the Army’s labs to provide briefings on the various ways industry can partner with the Army, such as through cooperative R&D agreements, commer- cial test agreements (in which Army labs test private-sector technologies) and the SBIR program.
Participating companies also benefit from public exposure and business develop- ment opportunities at the AUSA meeting in October in Washington, which hosts more than 700 exhibitors and 31,000 attendees, and the AUSA Global Force Symposium and Exposition in Huntsville, Alabama, in the spring, which hosts more than 200 exhibitors and 6,800 attendees. At these events, AUSA provides free admis- sion for the xTechSearch competitors and
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156