search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SUPPORTING THE FUTURE FORCE


team enabled the services to craft a joint road map that yielded immediate benefits by creating a common understanding of tech- nologies available in industry.


FOCUS AREAS Te Joint Lightweight Ammunition Integrated Product Team meets twice a year, hosted by one of the core members, but remains continuously engaged to coordinate efforts. Te focus of the biannual team meeting is to review ongoing efforts, look at test results and establish focus areas for upcoming activities.


During initial meetings, the services outlined the status of each of the ongoing and future programs and planned a joint road map, an overall approach to coordinating lightweight ammuni- tion programs. Based on the working partners’ priorities, initial efforts fell into the following focus areas:


• Army—7.62 mm. • Marine Corps—.50 caliber. • British Ministry of Defense—5.56 mm.


Additionally, SOCOM continued to explore commercially available solutions that fit niche capabilities, thus increasing the knowledge base across the integrated product team. Tis has allowed each partner to successfully leverage emerging data from multiple industry solutions in various calibers to minimize the workload and maximize resources.


Under the integrated product team, the joint services assessed lightweight case solutions from seven potential sources, includ- ing traditional defense contractors as well as small businesses, which are considered nontraditional sources. Te assessments looked strictly at requirements to demonstrate reliable function in legacy weapon systems while maintaining military-specified performance, which is more stringent than commercial standards. Primary challenges made apparent in testing include the ability to function reliably across extreme temperatures, the ability to maintain pressure and muzzle velocity, and the ability for the cases to properly eject from the weapon.


Tese robust performance requirements are balanced with the expected cost of manufacturing and any current capacity limi- tations on vendors for future manufacturing requirements. By coordinating within the Joint Lightweight Ammunition Inte- grated Product Team, the services can leverage results from multiple test events, which eliminates redundant testing and allows for a broad assessment across industry.


BRASS


STAINLESS STEEL


POLYMER


LOOKING TO THE FUTURE


JPEO A&A has been evaluating concepts for new 7.62 mm ammunition casings for their weight and operational performance compared with traditional brass ammunition, top. The concepts include composite casings, bottom, with a stainless steel base and a polymer body, and stainless steel casings, center. (Photos by JPEO A&A)


https://asc.ar my.mil


63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156