search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
A HAPPY MEDIUM


from rapid prototyping to rapid fielding throughout the middle- tier acquisition strategy’s five-year timeline.


One other scenario exists, and that is when a prototype proves unsuccessful. Failure requires a change of mindset that must be understood by all of the team members. “If it’s not working, then that’s OK; don’t burn resources on prototypes that are not producing positive results,” said Kelly Tisch, product manager for SATCOM/Tactical Cyber and chief of the Network Operations Business Management Division for PEO C3T’s Project Manager (PM) for Tactical Network. “Our DevOps process, with positive and negative feedback, allows us to change direction.”


UNIFIED NETWORK OPERATIONS Unified Network Operations will provide common network planning, configuration, management and monitoring via open framework and standards.


Like the Integrated Tactical Network, the Unified Network Operations effort is benefiting from the middle-tier acquisi- tion designation. As a software-based capability that leverages commercial technology to integrate across echelons, Unified Network Operations would have required input from multiple stakeholders just to form a set of requirements.


“Under DOD 5000, we would have had to develop a unified requirements document that addressed the tactical and enter- prise network,” Welch said. “Te process to collaborate with all of the stakeholders would have been much more time-consuming, and costly. With MTA, we can move forward as a rapid proto- type, and we did this with just receiving a memo out of the Cyber Center of Excellence.”


In addition, by not needing formal requirements, the Army was able to quickly perform market research with industry to leverage its approach for developing an overarching network capabil- ity such as Unified Network Operations. Trough requests for proposals and technical exchange meetings—initiated by the Network Cross-Functional Team—the team was able to deter- mine options for integrating existing capabilities with minimum development efforts.


CONCLUSION Middle-tier acquisition is part of a larger shift in culture within the acquisition community to identify capabilities suitable for accelerated prototyping and fielding efforts. PEO C3T has identified several key takeaways from its first mid-tier acqui- sition: Having flexible requirements means that a middle-tier


32 Army AL&T Magazine Fall 2019


acquisition does not deal in more stringent knowledge and skill criteria. Using middle-tier acquisition and other flexible acquisi- tion mechanisms, the Army can leverage advanced commercial technologies, which are critical to modernizing the force.


Brevity is also critical—when leadership has a clear vision of the common objective of middle-tier acquisition, programs will reduce their documentation.


Finally, don’t waste time in staffing when a clearly defined and simple plan allows you to begin your rapid integration of capa- bilities. Define your objective, establish a controlled but simple process to conduct your rapid acquisition and integration, have a recurring process to collect and incorporate user feedback, and be prepared to shift your direction quickly when needed.


“Te MTA process is just another tool in our acquisition toolbox,” Welch said. “Having flexibility in how we develop and field these capabilities gives Soldiers timely and advanced capabilities they need for successful missions.”


For more information, go to the PEO C3T website at http:// peoc3t.army.mil/c3t/ or contact the PEO C3T Public Affairs Office at 443-395-6489.


DOUGLAS W. BURBEY is deputy product manager for PEO C3T’s Product Manager for Tactical Cyber and Network Operations within PM Tactical Network. He holds an M.S. in administration from Central Michigan University and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He is Level III certified in program management and in information technology. His awards include the Legion of Merit, the Defense Meritorious Service Medal and the Meritorious Service Medal (five awards).


MINDY GABBERT is the project lead for the Integrated Tactical Network for PM Tactical Radios. She holds an M.S. in software engi- neering from Monmouth University and a B.S. in computer science and management information systems from St. Peter’s University. She is Level III certified in engineering.


KATHRYN BAILEY is a public communications specialist for Bowhead Business and Technologies Solutions, assigned to PEO C3T. She holds a B.A. in communications studies from the University of Maryland University College.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156