search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EVERY OUNCE MATTERS


Any reduction in equipment weight, often referred to as


“warfighter load,” will enhance warfighters’ readiness and increase mobility, survivability and lethality. In post-combat surveys, weight carried by the warfighter is frequently among the top concerns of combat veterans. While there are many pieces of equipment that add to this overall load, one common denomi- nator across the services is ammunition. Te cartridge case is the heaviest and hence the most logical area for initial weight reduc- tion efforts in small-caliber munitions.


BRASS HAS ITS ADVANTAGES Te cartridge case is a critical component that has remained largely unchanged since the advent of brass-cased ammunition in the mid- to late 19th century. Te Army has investigated the use of lighter materials for the past 50-plus years, always falling back on the performance, ease of manufacturing and robustness of brass case designs. Brass is a tough material that not only can stand up to firing pressures exceeding 70,000 pounds per square inch, but can spring outward under those firing pressures to seal the chamber and then spring back for easy extraction. Brass cases also can function and withstand storage at extreme temperatures of -65 degrees F to more than 160 degrees F.


Tose factors, combined with a reasonable material cost, good availability, scrap recyclability and ability to reload, make it a challenge to replace brass. Other services have also looked at possible alternatives, but had the same technical challenges in their own searches. Scattered efforts over time across the services did not yield successful designs.


Within the past few years, emerging technologies and manufac- turing improvements have created the opportunity for a fresh look at lightweight ammunition. With focused investments in research and development, improvements in ammunition cartridge cases are possible and with development can be ready for military use.


In 2016, the Project Manager for Maneuver Ammunition Systems (PM MAS) within the Joint Program Executive Office for Arma- ments and Ammunition (JPEO A&A, formerly the PEO for Ammunition), along with the Marine Corps, led an effort to establish a charter among key stakeholders that would help bring together requirement and materiel developers from all services.


Te purpose of the Joint Lightweight Ammunition Integrated Product Team is to document the approach and to synchronize activities and investments across programs to achieve lightweight ammunition goals. Te mission of the team is to collaborate on combat requirements, materiel developer solutions and joint


62 Army AL&T Magazine Fall 2019


POLYMER HAS POSSIBILITIES


These 7.62 mm casings are made using polymer, a promising material for reducing the weight of ammunition. (Photo by JPEO A&A)


qualification of lightweight ammunition using alternative case materials that would meet or exceed the performance of current brass-cased ammunition in standard service weapons. Te objec- tives include activities that will support a successful transition to the single manager for conventional ammunition, which is repre- sented by PM MAS. Moreover, the integrated product team used active international partnerships to gain valuable insight into active lightweight efforts within Britain’s Ministry of Defense.


Before the establishment of the team, each of the services was exploring lightweight ammunition, with little or no coordination. Te efforts were often overlapping, and resources were not opti- mized to ensure product development within an established plan to deliver lightweight ammunition to the warfighter.


In the Army, the Joint Capabilities Integration and Develop- ment System-approved Family of Ammunition requirements (5.56 mm, 7.62 mm, .50-caliber) call for reducing the weight of ammunition. Te Marine Corps and the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) continued to investigate lighter ammuni- tion not only for their warfighters but for their aircraft operations as well. Reducing the weight of the ammunition allows aircraft to carry more ammunition to support critical missions, allows room for other critical supplies or creates additional fuel capac- ity for extended missions. Te need to collaborate and learn from each service’s efforts is clear. Te chartered integrated product


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156