search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


have been paid to consolidate, transport or demilitarize this equipment. In this case, these trucks will help Morocco in its efforts to modernize its military, provide interoperability and build relations needed in today’s multidomain battlefield.


Trough September 2019, USASAC had transferred and shipped 50 vehicles to partner nations; the last 50 should be shipped by the end of fiscal year 2019. Tis speed is unprecedented: Most excess defense articles cases typically take three to six months for the approval process and sometimes several years to complete. Once the final 50 vehicles are shipped, this case will have been implemented and closed within one year.


USASAC has previously tested this theory, but could not completely codify it, during the Army’s divestment of OH-58D Kiowa Warrior helicopters. Te Army initially issued a directive to divest all OH-58Ds, but amended its plans to “partial divest” and wanted to store them at Davis- Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona. Each retained aircraft cost the Army approxi- mately $35,000 to prepare for type A storage (which involved encasing the


UPWARD MOBILITY


Contractors working for a foreign partner’s freight forwarder load an M1078 Medium Tactical Vehicle for transport. USASAC has transferred and shipped 50 vehicles to Morocco so far this year, and will ship 50 more by the end of fiscal year 2019. (U.S. Army photo by the author)


engine and electronics in shrink or bubble wrap for long-term storage). After type A storage, the cost to bring each helicopter back to operational status is $350,000 to $500,000.


USASAC had foreign partners—Croatia, Greece and Tunisia—that were interested in the OH-58Ds, and the Excess Defense Articles team created a plan that would transition the aircraft and generate cost savings for the Army and the partners. Te plan included storing the aircraft in flight- ready condition, paid for by the customer (at a cost of $3,000 a month), at Redstone Arsenal Airfield, Alabama. Te Army thereby avoided the transportation and storage prep costs, and the foreign part- ners avoided the regeneration cost that would have been incurred with sending them to Arizona.


CONCLUSION Tis commonsense thinking has been the driving force behind USASAC’s efforts to transform the Excess Defense Articles program from a reactive pseudo-solution to a proactive force multiplier. Being able to identify up front which allies or partners may be able to use the Army’s


outdated, excess equipment speeds up the process of removing it


from the


Army’s inventory and helps build capac- ity in allies and partners. Te result is a win-win situation for Army and ally and partner readiness. Te Army divests excess equipment quickly at the unit level, which also speeds up modernization of the unit and saves money. Additionally, partners and allies receive military equipment at a reduced cost while gaining both a capabil- ity and interoperability with U.S. forces.


For more information, contact the author at 256-450-4750 or contact Lem Williams, chief of the USASAC Operations Division, at 256-450-4043.


MARCUS MACKEY is the USASAC G-3 Excess Defense Articles Modernization program manager at Redstone Arsenal. He is a retired Army veteran with more than 20 years of service as a logistician with multiple deployments to Iraq, Somalia and Bosnia. He was recently inducted into the Madison County, Alabama, Hall of Heroes 2018 class. He holds a B.S. in management from the University of Phoenix.


https://asc.ar my.mil


97


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156