search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SUPPORTING THE FUTURE FORCE


to get involved in as many different requirements as early as you can to gain experience.”


Prihoda has been in the acquisition workforce for three years, following six years as an infantry Soldier with the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. His military service also includes four years with the Marine Corps, where he served before attending college and law school. “I applied to become a 51C [contracting NCO] in 2015, and accessed into the field in 2016. What appealed the most to me was being able to use past experiences in the field of purchasing, and working with federal regulations.”


Fort Hood is Prihoda’s first acquisition duty station, and his nine-month stint in Poland was his first forward assignment as a contracting NCO. “It was a great experience to be forward with the units we support, and to see how contracting efforts have an immediate and direct impact on the mission,” he said. It was also somewhat of a baptism by fire. “In garrison, the contracting process has a fairly long timeline. But in a forward assignment, someone will come to you on Monday and ask you for some- thing they needed yesterday. Missions change rapidly, so there’s a much shorter turnaround time. It really required me to think and move quickly.”


His return from Poland coincided with a request from a fellow Soldier to join him in training for the Best Warrior Competition. In May, he beat out nine other Soldiers in a weeklong event and was named ACC Best Warrior of the Year. He represented ACC at the U.S. Army Materiel Command’s Best Warrior Competi- tion, which was held at Camp Atterbury, Indiana, in July. (Sgt. 1st Class Reginald Alexander, a contracting NCO with the 921st Contracting Battalion at Wheeler Army Airfield, Hawaii, came out on top at that event.)


Te competition includes physical fitness as well as knowledge of Army tasks and exercises. Prihoda and the other participants completed the Army physical fitness test, an 8-mile road march, weapons qualification, combat water survival, warrior battle drills and land navigation, as well as an interview with a board of ACC senior NCOs, a written test and an essay.


“Sergeant Prihoda is the total package, and well-deserving of the title of ACC’s best NCO,” said ACC Command Sgt. Maj. Jill Crosby. “He is articulate, in amazing physical condition, and exceeds the standards in all the best warrior competition events.”


—SUSAN L. FOLLETT


BEING THE BEST


Prihoda represented Army Contracting Command at the 2019 Best Warrior Competition. (Photo by Ben Gonzales, MICC)


https://asc.ar my.mil


47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156