search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
VITAL SIGNS, VIRTUALLY


PREPPING FOR SHOWTIME


Stan Evans, ACC video teleconference coordinator, and Kim Green, operations specialist, ACC Operations Group, prepare for the Commander’s Update Brief video teleconference on March 5. (U.S. Army photo by Edward G. Worley, ACC)


Oversight is a responsibility shared at all levels, with HCAs conducting PMRs of each of their principal assistants respon- sible for contracting (PARCs). In turn, each of the PARCs conducts contracting management reviews on their subordi- nate contracting centers and offices. Te ECC looks at each PARC once every two years. In the past, the command fielded teams that traveled to contracting office locations to perform extensive reviews and assessments of contract files and pro- cesses. Each visit took 10 business days.


PMRs are vital to inspecting and report- ing the overall health, efficiency and effectiveness of Army contracting pro- grams. Procurement authority rests with the secretary of the Army, and Appen- dix CC of the Army Federal Acquisition Regulations Supplement charges the ASA(ALT) with exercising that author- ity. Te deputy assistant secretary of the Army


for procurement (DASA(P)) is


responsible for the PMR program, but the various HCAs execute the program.


In coming up with the virtual solu- tion, Gallagher reasoned that electronic access to the complete contract files, coupled with real-time video teleconfer- ence interviews with key players, could give the team a clear enough picture of each CSB to assess the overall risk. He saw an opportunity for a virtual PMR environment and to grow the capability across the U.S. Army Contracting Com- mand (ACC) workforce by forming his PMR teams with members from across the globe.


Te virtual process is no match for an on-location PMR. It doesn’t provide the immersive experience of being on-site, nor can it ever give team members an appreciation of their colleagues’ environ- ment and working conditions. Still, the command is confident that the virtual


review can provide an accurate assess- ment of the risk factors that the PARC is managing.


FOCUSING ON RISK PMR teams consist of procurement experts with experience in every aspect of contracting. A complete PMR provides a detailed report that provides the CSB commander with a picture of every work- ing segment of the organization.


To keep the program from becoming a check-the-box procedure, ASA(ALT) provides annual guidance on special areas of interest, and each HCA devel- ops its own list from observations made throughout the year. As different as the specifics are, there are no surprises. Each memorandum notifying the parties of an upcoming PMR details the catego- ries to be assessed and includes a specific list of contracting actions that need to be available for review.


102


Army AL&T Magazine


October–December 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196