search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SYNCHRONIZING THE FORCE


KEEPING UP THE FLEET Sustainment of the Army’s helicoper fleet is one of the key questions that the G-8 faces as it looks at the next steps after bringing materiel home from Afghanistan. Here, AH-64 Apache helicopter maintenance Soldiers with 1st Attack/Reconnaissance Battalion, 501st Aviation Regiment (1/501 ARB), Task Force Dragon, conduct a 500-hour phase-maintenance inspection June 27 at FOB Fenty, Nangarhar province, Afghanistan. (U.S. Army photo by SGT Armando Avila, 1/501 ARB Public Affairs)


We turn next to ABO and look at how we are executing against it [the budget]. How is AMC doing? FORSCOM? TRADOC? What do we need to shift? Tis is what the reset task force is trying to bring together. We then go to talk to ASA(ALT) and say, “How are you spending the money? What’s not been spent?” We do this each year. We try to synchronize requirements and resources with acquisition. It’s relatively granular.


We also use the outcomes of this work to tee up conversations with the Hill. We frequently need to have dialogues with the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. A couple of years ago, we had too much money because there was a lot of equipment we thought we had to bring back to the States but instead


were able to divert from Iraq to Afghani- stan. We thought we’d have a heavier track requirement than we did, so there was a lot of work programmed for track maintenance, which wasn’t needed. Te result was that we had about $1 billion left over. So, we went over to the Hill and talked to professional staff members and made sure they knew what we were doing and why. Our task force work helped to shape that conversation.


Army AL&T: Can you tell us what the most important lessons learned are from retrograde in Iraq?


Skibicki: I think the number one lesson we learned was to bring everybody, all the lines of effort, to the table. We did that prior to the drawdown from Iraq


with rehearsal-of-concept drills run by U.S. Army Central/Tird Army (ARCENT) and AMC. ARCENT made sure that all the necessary participants were there, from the actual units that had the equipment and their higher-level commands, to the transporters, to the LCMCs that reset the equipment, the people developing require- ments for diverting equipment from Iraq to Afghanistan, and ASA(ALT)—every- body was there. We made sure all of the subject-matter experts and members of the team were involved. Te last session we had of the R4D General Officer Steering Committee, we made sure everybody was there—Army National Guard, U.S. Army Reserve, FORSCOM—all the affected commands, because everybody has a dif- ferent perspective. U.S. Army Pacific Command has a different perspective on


68


Army AL&T Magazine


October–December 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196