search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Preserving the Satellite Backbone by LTC Leonard Newman


As Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) winds down, ground satellite systems will still be necessary as a line of communi- cations at the small forward operating bases that could remain after 2014 if the United States and Afghanistan reach such an agreement.


Secure Internet Protocol Router/ Non-secure Internet Protocol (SIPR/ NIPR) Access Points (SNAPs) are Teater Provided Equipment (TPE) designed for use at the company echelon and small combat outposts. Tey enable units in austere environments to pull down SIPR/ NIPR-centric services and communicate with higher headquarters. As Warfighter Information


Network – Tactical


(WIN-T) Increment 1 equipment returns to the United States, SNAPs will fill some of the gap and support the small Army presence that could remain past 2014.


One of the challenges the Army will face will be


ensuring that enough SNAPs


stay behind in theater to fulfill opera- tional requirements as they arise. Today, SNAPs continue to support the last of the Army personnel still in Iraq, and they are expected to be among the last of the Army’s equipment to remain in Afghanistan.


Some of the SNAPs coming out of OEF will be refurbished in the United States


Packages (GRRIPs) as a bridge to future network programs of record.


Tis repurposing effort is expected to provide significant cost savings in the early stages of WIN-T Increment 1’s Transportable Tactical Command Com- munications (T2C2) program. T2C2 will provide small teams with robust voice and data communications capabilities in the initial phases of joint operations. Until the T2C2 capability is fielded, repur- posed GRRIPs and SNAPs will help fill those communications requirements.


Like SNAPs, GRRIPs are TPE and are fielded worldwide through operational needs statements (ONS). Tey provide voice and data capability without the need of fixed infrastructure. Tey are small enough to fit in the overhead bin of an airplane and take only a few minutes to set up. Unlike other network equip- ment being pulled out of theater, GRRIPs continue to be fielded into Afghanistan to fill ONS and support operations. Te Army is repurposing GRRIPS no longer needed to support units deploying back to the States to fill other ONS in OEF.


and used to fulfill U.S. Cen-


tral Command (CENTCOM) mission requirements in Kuwait and other locations in its area of responsibility. Additionally, over the next few years the Army plans to use 360 SNAPs and 550 Global Rapid Response Information


Te WIN-T network architecture in Afghanistan also includes Deployable Ku-band Earth Terminals (DKETs), which were designed to support larger hub locations for long-haul transport both intra- and inter-theater. Tey pro- vide much larger bandwidth capabilities and volume distribution than the smaller SNAPs. However, as the force in Afghan- istan shrinks and the Army retrogrades DKETs, SNAPs will provide the network


backbone necessary to support commu- nications for remaining forces.


Some of the retrograded DKET equip- ment will


stay forward to support


contingency operations, some will move to a warehouse to fill requirements as they arise, and the rest will return to the States for distribution to other services or combatant commands.


Already, one of CENTCOM’s new and unused DKETs was sent to fill require- ments in the Horn of Africa, avoiding the time and the $1.6 million needed to buy a new unit. In the future, the reuse and redeployment of each retrograded DKET could realize a cost avoidance of more than $1.1 million (the cost of buying a new unit, less the cost of refurbishing a used unit), as well as the significant time savings of not having to acquire brand-new equipment.


PM WIN-T is working to ensure that the proper mix of equipment remains in theater to support enduring operations, while keeping efficiencies at the forefront of its retrograde efforts.


LTC LEONARD NEWMAN is the Prod- uct Manager Satellite Communications, assigned to Project Manager WIN-T. He holds a bachelor’s of business admin- istration in accounting from Howard University and an MBA in information systems from Florida Institute of Technol- ogy. He is Level III certified in information technology and Level II in program man- agement. Newman is a member of the U.S. Army Acquisition Corps.


ASC.ARMY.MIL


13


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196