search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
For PEO C3T’s Project Manager War- fighter Information Network – Tactical (PM WIN-T), the process for resetting laptops was excessively lengthy. Tey went out to contractors for reset, and although the


contractors mostly met


their obligations, sometimes the com- puters did not return on time.


Even when they did, the process was simply too long. Trough LSS, I found that if Soldiers could do the reset work themselves, that saved not only turn- around time, but also money—almost $10 million over the next five years.


After testing the new process with two units at their home stations in the United States, Soldiers overwhelm- ingly reported improved results. Tey reduced turnaround times from 30 days to only a few hours of work, eliminating shipping costs and increasing account- ability—since the laptops remained in the Soldiers’ possession—with no loss in quality of service.


Although the LSS project began with an accountability problem,


I realized


there were also potentially significant cost savings. Trough LSS, it was just a matter of developing a process that is tested and proven, using metrics. Now I’m hoping to implement this proce- dural change for other commercial off-the-shelf systems.


—MR. KEVIN JOYCE


REVAMPING SLOW DISTRIBUTION Before my LSS project, it took an average of 51 days for PEO C3T’s Project Manager Joint Battle Command – Plat- form (PM JBC-P) to send software to various vendors and customers. Using a database and automated process adopted as a result of my team’s LSS project, the


DIY RESET


Through his LSS project, Kevin Joyce of the WIN-T Project Management Office found that if Soldiers could do the reset work on laptops themselves, the Army could save turnaround time and money— almost $10 million over the next five years. (U.S. Army photo by Meg Carpenter)


DELIVERING RESULTS


PM JBC-P reduced the time required to obtain and send software to various vendors and customers from an average of 51 days to three by using a database and automated process adopted as a result of an LSS project. Here, CPT Samuel Greulich of 1st Battalion, 35th Armored Regiment, 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division monitors the JBC-P in his vehicle to track the progress of his Soldiers May 7 during a training exercise at McGregor Range, NM. (U.S. Army photo by SGT Robert Golden, 16th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment)


ASC.ARMY.MIL


171


WORKFORCE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196