search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
$


WORKING IN SYNC Interoperability among all Army UAS assets is a key element of MUM-T. Here, Interoperability Engineer David Campbell, a contractor with Dynetics, works on AIC testing of the Gray Eagle and Apache Block III at JSIL, Redstone Arsenal, AL. (U.S. Army photo courtesy of PM UAS)


MUM-T capabilities


have


continued


to evolve, based on lessons learned over more than 10 years of combat


in Iraq


and Afghanistan. Now the Army is real- izing efficiencies in life-cycle cost from MUM-T through the use of common data standards. PM UAS’ Common Sys- tems Integration Product Office (PdM CSI), as the executive agent for MUM-T technologies, makes these common stan- dards possible.


THE INTEROPERABILITY SOLUTION Te primary challenge associated with MUM-T is developing, testing and cer- tifying the capability while establishing interoperability among all Army UAS assets. Development costs involve the procurement of radios, terminals and software, along with testing, fixing and


Te guiding documentation for the implementation of MUM-T stems from interoperability profiles (IOPs) devel- oped by the PdM CSI. While the scope of the IOPs is much broader than MUM- T, they are common to all UAS and manned assets, and serve well as a basis for MUM-T development, testing and deployment.


As the development of UAS has pro- gressed and the Army has identified and overcome technical hurdles, the concept of “design, fly, fix and repeat” has some- times been costly and caused integration delays. To reduce cost, increase qual- ity and accelerate schedule, the Joint Technology Center/System Integration


retesting to ensure that the capability works as expected.


Lab (JSIL)


at Redstone Arsenal, AL,


has become the centerpiece for all UAS interoperability testing.


After interoperability compliance testing and certification, UAS assets generally transfer to the Central Technical Sup- port Facility (CTSF) at Fort Hood, TX, for Army interoperability certification (AIC). Recently, the JSIL and PdM CSI conducted a review of additional test- ing sites involved with UAS, manned aircraft interoperability testing and MUM-T, and determined that linking the labs virtually through the Defense Research and Engineering Network (DREN) could leverage capabilities at the two facilities to gain efficiencies in both process and spending. Tis virtual connection eliminated not only the need to maintain personnel at both facilities


ASC.ARMY.MIL


141


BBP 2.0


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196