search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NOT SIMPLY ‘SMALL MEN’


A Soldier gets help adjusting her prototype Generation III IOTV from a fellow Soldier Aug. 21, 2012, at Fort Campbell, KY. Both women are with the 1st Brigade Combat Team Female Engagement Team, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault). This prototype was designed specifically for the needs of female Soldiers, with shorter torso length and other improvements for a tighter and more contoured fit. (Photo by Megan Locke Simpson, The Fort Campbell Courier.)


1980 & 2012 F


or its Se iss issue, ma


sue, t magazine


September-October 1980 the Army RD&A news- (now Army AL&T


magazine) interviewed COL


Robert J. Cuthbertson, commander of what was then called the Natick Army Research and Development Command, for an issue devoted to protective cloth- ing for the Soldier. Cuthbertson noted


“that the Army system ‘buries’ the indi- vidual Soldier under the category of ‘combat support-other’; changing


this


approach would be a step in the right direction,” he said.


Fast-forward to 2012, when Time magazine named female body armor one of its Best Inventions of the Year for 2012. T at’s alongside self-infl ating tires,


the Tesla Model S sedan, the


Civilization Starter Kit and NASA’s Z-1 space suit. It’s likely that the body armor Soldiers use today was about as


impossible to imagine in 1980 as


an electric car with a body style and performance rivaling a Jaguar, a suit that will enable astronauts


to survive


in deep space, or do-it-yourself versions of “the 50 most important machines required for modern life”—much less an Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV) designed specifi cally for women.


In its pithy write-up of the new body armor, which was designed in a collabora- tive eff ort of the Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center and Program Executive Offi ce (PEO) Soldier, Time noted, “Women are not small men.” T e new version provides a better, more secure fi t for female Soldiers.


MAJ Joel Dillon, the assistant product manager at PEO Soldier who is respon- sible for soft armor, noted that all of the female Soldiers


in the 101st Airborne


Division who tested it in a head-to-head comparison with the current IOTV chose the new version. “It was just really obvi- ous to me that the form, fi t, and function are defi nitely what we were shooting for.” T at kind of focus is a long way from “combat support, other.”


To see a video explaining the changes made to make the IOTV fit women bet- ter, go to http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=XyDVcz2pvDM. For more information on the article in Time, go to http://techland.time.com/2012/11/01/ best-inventions-of-the-year-2012/slide/ all/. For a historical tour of AL&T over the past 52 years, visit the Army AL&T maga- zine archives at http://asc.army.mil/web/ magazine/alt-magazine-archive/.


164


Army AL&T Magazine


April–June 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168